1980
DOI: 10.1109/tim.1980.4314959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Differential-Phase Generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard deviation of the unit reproduction (random error) does not exceed 0.0009 " at PSA up to 5 " and increases to 0.005 O at 360 ". audiofrequency range [6]. In Czechoslovakia, a phase-measuring apparatus has been produced with an accuracy of 0.005" to 0.05" in the frequency range from 30 Hz to 10 kHz [7].…”
Section: Psa Standard Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard deviation of the unit reproduction (random error) does not exceed 0.0009 " at PSA up to 5 " and increases to 0.005 O at 360 ". audiofrequency range [6]. In Czechoslovakia, a phase-measuring apparatus has been produced with an accuracy of 0.005" to 0.05" in the frequency range from 30 Hz to 10 kHz [7].…”
Section: Psa Standard Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novel concept of MMG proposed in this paper is critical for the evaluation of the PIM performance of a chamber for antenna PIM measurements. However, according to our knowledge, the recent research on PIM is mainly focused on analyses of PIM models [21][22][23] and PIM test devices [24][25][26][27]. At present, no one has proposed a similar idea of defining the MMG of the PIM measurement chamber, and thus there is no corresponding method of estimating the MMG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First modern sampling digital phase meters used fast Fourier transform for signal analysis [1] with uncertainties about 4 millidegree. Today it is possible to achieve uncertainties about 0.5 millidegree [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%