2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8090717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Measurement of Stem Diameter by Simulating the Path of Diameter Tape from Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data

Abstract: Accurate measurement of stem diameter is essential to forest inventory. As a millimeter-level measuring tool, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has not yet reached millimeter-level accuracy in stem diameter measurements. The objective of this study is to develop an accurate method for deriving the stem diameter from TLS data. The methodology of stem diameter measurement by diameter tape was adopted. The stem cross-section at a given height along the stem was determined. Stem points for stem diameter retrieval … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9). Presented accuracies of DBH estimation are much lower compared to the latest results from TLS using a more complex method of data processing and DBH estimation (You et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…9). Presented accuracies of DBH estimation are much lower compared to the latest results from TLS using a more complex method of data processing and DBH estimation (You et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The distance between planes of 10 cm was selected to ensure that 100 points are included in the cross-section, and that the frustum of the stem had virtually no taper (we assumed a constant diameter for any 10 cm along the stem under the canopy). Other studies used smaller distances between the planes (i.e., 5 cm by Maas et al [46] or 1 cm by You et al [16]), but they were focused on the lower portion of the stem (≤4 m) where enough points existed for constructing the cross-section of the stem. This study focused on the merchantable portion of the stem (i.e., below canopy), which considered larger heights where fewer points exist; therefore, a larger distance was used.…”
Section: Photorammetric Point Cloud Generation and Diameter Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameters were measured in two ways: one mirroring the field procedures for taper estimation from the ground (i.e., side view of the stem), and one mirroring the approach of You et al [16] (i.e., top view or circumference-based). The side measurement was acquired by averaging four diameters obtained by rotating the stem by approximately 90 • .…”
Section: Photorammetric Point Cloud Generation and Diameter Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower segments feature more complex stem shapes, especially when the root systems are partially exposed. Figures 11 and 12 show that the biases of estimated diameter and location at the height of 0.65 m are usually larger than, for example, 1 m-2 m. Advanced curve fitting strategy should be developed for future studies, such as [27,56], to resolve such issues. Figures 11 and 12 also indicate that the results' accuracy drops along with the height starting from approximately 6 m above the ground.…”
Section: Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%