2018
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision and accuracy of Dahl‐Lea back‐calculated smolt lengths from adult scales of Atlantic salmonSalmo salar

Abstract: Using tagged and recaptured Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (n = 106) the present analysis shows that the most commonly applied linear back-calculation method for estimating past length, the Dahl-Lea method, resulted in overestimation of the length of large smolts and underestimation of small smolts. A correction equation (y = 0.53x + 6.23) for estimating true smolt length (y) from lengths back-calculated from adult scale measures (x) to account for these systematic discrepancies is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scale reading methods followed international guidelines on age and growth determination in salmon ( 67 , 68 ). Studies on marked and recaptured fish have found good correspondence between the period spent at sea versus sea age inferred using scale reading ( 66 ) and size at first capture versus back-calculated size ( 69 , 70 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale reading methods followed international guidelines on age and growth determination in salmon ( 67 , 68 ). Studies on marked and recaptured fish have found good correspondence between the period spent at sea versus sea age inferred using scale reading ( 66 ) and size at first capture versus back-calculated size ( 69 , 70 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present data are for stratified subsamples ( n = 1947; 96–114 fish per year) spanning the full available date range of 1SW return migrants captured within each year (typically April/May to end August). Fish were measured (fork length, rounded down to 0.5 cm) and weighed (to 0.01 kg), and scale samples removed from the standard region (Hanson et al ., 2019; Shearer, 1992). Scales were air‐dried in paper packets and stored for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimate of the body length of each fish at the midpoint of the winter annulus was derived by back‐calculation of scale measures, and by applying the correction factor of Hanson et al . (2019) to the estimate of body length of the smolt at river emigration. Growth in body length between smolt emigration and capture of the measured adult fish was assumed to be isometric with the scale radius.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon return, a proportion of the salmon is captured by anglers, who report size of each fish and often provide researchers with a scale sample ( 8 ). Experienced scale readers can reconstruct individual growth in length at different periods at sea by analyzing growth pattern in the scales ( 9 , 10 ). By using these data in combination with information on capture site and biological information about the species, it is possible to reconstruct spatiotemporal patterns in marine growth and thereby infer detailed information on the marine conditions while the fish was at sea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%