1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)89403-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision determination of gadolinium in cadmium fluoride by neutron activation analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many methods for the low-level Gd monitoring in solution. Most of them are spectroscopic methods such as spectrofluorimetry (Reisfeld and Biron 1970;Taketatsu and Sato 1978;Berg, Mainka, and Ache 1989;Hu et al 1997), spectrophotometry (Mori et al 1992), ICP-AES (Normann et al 2000), Novel Gadolinium Optical Sensor 191 ICP-MS (Behrens 1995;Cao, Yin, and Li 1999;Hennebruder et al 2004;Isnard et al 2005), LC (Winget and Lindstrom 1971), electron spin resonance (ESR) (Moyer and McCarthy 1969;Miyake and Imoto 1996;Miyake, Kanamaru, and Imoto 1986), laser-based multistep resonance ionization MS (Blaum et al 2002), phosphorescence (Gong and Zhang 1997), and some neutron activation methods (Marsh and Allie 1969;Jinno et al 1979). These methods have either low sensitivity, are time-consuming, involving multiple sample manipulations, or are too expensive for most analytical laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods for the low-level Gd monitoring in solution. Most of them are spectroscopic methods such as spectrofluorimetry (Reisfeld and Biron 1970;Taketatsu and Sato 1978;Berg, Mainka, and Ache 1989;Hu et al 1997), spectrophotometry (Mori et al 1992), ICP-AES (Normann et al 2000), Novel Gadolinium Optical Sensor 191 ICP-MS (Behrens 1995;Cao, Yin, and Li 1999;Hennebruder et al 2004;Isnard et al 2005), LC (Winget and Lindstrom 1971), electron spin resonance (ESR) (Moyer and McCarthy 1969;Miyake and Imoto 1996;Miyake, Kanamaru, and Imoto 1986), laser-based multistep resonance ionization MS (Blaum et al 2002), phosphorescence (Gong and Zhang 1997), and some neutron activation methods (Marsh and Allie 1969;Jinno et al 1979). These methods have either low sensitivity, are time-consuming, involving multiple sample manipulations, or are too expensive for most analytical laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of Gd in various environmental matrices can be carried out by using different analytical methods such as inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry/mass spectrometry (ICP-OES/MS) [9][10][11], electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy [12,13], fluorescence [14], time-resolved fluorimetry [15], nuclear methods [16] and potentiometric methods [6,[17][18][19], etc. Most of these methods involve high-cost instruments, trained manpower, tedious sample preparations and are often time consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]. Different analytical techniques such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [4][5][6][7][8], electron spin resonance (ESR) [9,10], spectrofluorometry [11,12], electrochemical sensor [13,14,2,15,16] and neutron activation analysis [17] have been performed to determine Gadolinium in various samples. Usage of spectrophotometry for determination of Gd(III) is very suitable because this method is the inexpensive and available in all laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%