2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of Robotic Guided Instrumentation for Acetabular Component Positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…compared with 80% (40/50) of the control group ( P = 0.001). Similarly, Kanawade et al . performed a prospective study of 44 patients (48 hips) who underwent robotic‐assisted THA and found the 5° outlier rate of implant inclination/anteversion of the postoperative CT from preoperative plan were 88%/84%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…compared with 80% (40/50) of the control group ( P = 0.001). Similarly, Kanawade et al . performed a prospective study of 44 patients (48 hips) who underwent robotic‐assisted THA and found the 5° outlier rate of implant inclination/anteversion of the postoperative CT from preoperative plan were 88%/84%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During the Mako robotic assisted THA, computer tomography (CT) based preoperative planning is used to accurately plan the hip replacement and the robotic arm is used to prepare the bone and place the components. Robotic‐arm assisted technology has been shown to recreate the head center, offset and leg length more accurately when compared to manual technique. In a few published studies, robotic THA has been associated with improved patient reported outcomes, decreased dislocation rates, and high forgotten joint scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, future efforts in clinical care, research, and policy efforts should be focused on identifying multistakeholder strategies to reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infections, dislocations, and other potentially avoidable causes of early revision THA. Such strategies could include increased emphasis on preoperative optimization of risk factors for periprosthetic joint infections, appropriate use and discontinuation of prophylactic antibiotics, reduced surgical times, improved surgical training through the use of surgical simulators, and perhaps tools to help surgeons improve the accuracy of acetabular cup placement during primary THA [12,20,34]. This places additional responsibility on the surgeon(s) and the surgical or hospital team to improve these outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most precise/accurate method published is computer navigation which can give a precision of less than 5 o for both inclination and anteversion [7]. Recent use of robotic technology (MAKO, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) is reproducible but has precision of 7.5 o which is close to that of an experienced surgeon for inclination [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%