2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-393x(02)80061-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preclinical evidence of azelastine hydrochloride activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second-generation antihistamines are characterized by reduced lipophilicity, large size, and extensive protein binding, and specifi city for the H 1 -receptor [6]. We compared effects of selected 2nd generation H 1 -antihistamines on the respiratory burst of rat phagocytes with those of dithiaden, a fi rst-generation H 1 -antihistamine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second-generation antihistamines are characterized by reduced lipophilicity, large size, and extensive protein binding, and specifi city for the H 1 -receptor [6]. We compared effects of selected 2nd generation H 1 -antihistamines on the respiratory burst of rat phagocytes with those of dithiaden, a fi rst-generation H 1 -antihistamine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other possible mechanisms for this inhibitory effect of antihistamines could be via interference with calcium ion movement, enzymatic pathways or second messengers [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibition of ROS generation by antihistamines might beneficially contribute to the treatment of allergic noninfectious inflammation and support the treatment of acute exacerbation of pathological inflammation (Thurmond et al 2008). It has been suggested that the suppression of CL by antihistamines is not a result of their direct scavenging activities; rather, it originates from their interference with calcium movement, enzyme pathways, or second messenger interaction (Lieberman 2002;Králová et al 2006). However, compounds without any intracellular effect should not interfere with generation of ROS in neutrophils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%