2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precompensating for spread of excitation in a cochlear implant coding strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is one reason why, when evaluating published studies, we have stressed the importance of basic aspects of experimental design such as blinding and the inclusion of adequate control groups or conditions; even small biases or experimenter effects may be of a similar size to the genuine advances one is trying to measure. Fortunately, attention to these basic tenets is now becoming the norm, for example with many recent studies incorporating a double-blind design (Magnusson 2011a; Koning and Wouters 2016;Nogueira et al 2016;Riss et al 2016;Bolner et al 2020;Lopez-Poveda et al 2020). Future improvements may build on the increased use in other areas of science and medicine of pre-registered reports (Munafò et al 2017)-something that would be particularly useful in studies where there are multiple dependent variables and/or possible data analyses.…”
Section: Improving Hearing With Existing CI Technology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is one reason why, when evaluating published studies, we have stressed the importance of basic aspects of experimental design such as blinding and the inclusion of adequate control groups or conditions; even small biases or experimenter effects may be of a similar size to the genuine advances one is trying to measure. Fortunately, attention to these basic tenets is now becoming the norm, for example with many recent studies incorporating a double-blind design (Magnusson 2011a; Koning and Wouters 2016;Nogueira et al 2016;Riss et al 2016;Bolner et al 2020;Lopez-Poveda et al 2020). Future improvements may build on the increased use in other areas of science and medicine of pre-registered reports (Munafò et al 2017)-something that would be particularly useful in studies where there are multiple dependent variables and/or possible data analyses.…”
Section: Improving Hearing With Existing CI Technology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nogueira et al (2016) introduced the Spectral Enhancement Strategy (SES), which attenuates energy in the spectral valleys prior to channel selection, and reported a 0.57 dB improvement in SRT relative to ACE. Bolner et al (2020) described another method, termed SPACE, that compensates for the estimated current spread from each electrode prior to the channel selection stage. When applied to mixtures of target speech in four-talker babble, without prior knowledge of the clean speech, it produced a significant 1.4 dB reduction in SRT averaged across six participants, compared to the standard ACE strategy.…”
Section: Experimental Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one reason why, when evaluating published studies, we have stressed the importance of basic aspects of experimental design such as blinding and the inclusion of adequate control groups or conditions; even small biases or experimenter effects may be of a similar size to the genuine advances one is trying to measure. Fortunately, attention to these basic tenets is now becoming the norm, for example with many recent Carlyon & Goehring -21 st century CI 41 studies incorporating a double-blind design (Magnusson, 2011a;Koning and Wouters, 2016;Nogueira et al, 2016;Riss et al, 2016;Bolner et al, 2020;Lopez-Poveda et al, 2020).…”
Section: Improving Hearing With Existing CI Technology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it will be important to determine whether the advances obtained by different approaches are additive -an issue that led one scientist to remark, only half-jokingly, that they had Carlyon & Goehring -21 st century CI 42 seen so many 5% improvements reported throughout their career that patients should now be scoring more that 100% on speech tests. For example, the various processing algorithms that enhance modulations across time (Koning and Wouters, 2016;Lamping et al, 2020) or across electrodes (Nogueira et al, 2016;Bolner et al, 2020;Lopez-Poveda et al, 2020) are likely addressing the same basic goal of increasing the contrast in the pattern of electrical stimulation (electrodogram), typically by attenuating or removing loweramplitude pulses. To the extent that different algorithms attenuate the same pulses their benefits may not sum.…”
Section: Improving Hearing With Existing CI Technology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation