1995
DOI: 10.1038/377621a0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation risk and the cost of being fat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
257
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
257
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The above decline in body mass is in contrast to the situation among British passerines where reduced predation pressure by sparrowhawks (A. nisus) in woodlands was followed by a body mass increase (and, when the sparrowhawk population recovered, body mass decreased to the previous level) (Gosler & Greenwood 1995) rather than a decrease as observed here. The di¡erence in the trends in body mass between the two countries may be explained by two facts: (i) only one (the Sardinian warbler) of the species studied here inhabits woodland and (ii) the sparrowhawk is a rare summer breeder in Israel and other avian predators of birds are rare in Israel (Shirihai 1996).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The above decline in body mass is in contrast to the situation among British passerines where reduced predation pressure by sparrowhawks (A. nisus) in woodlands was followed by a body mass increase (and, when the sparrowhawk population recovered, body mass decreased to the previous level) (Gosler & Greenwood 1995) rather than a decrease as observed here. The di¡erence in the trends in body mass between the two countries may be explained by two facts: (i) only one (the Sardinian warbler) of the species studied here inhabits woodland and (ii) the sparrowhawk is a rare summer breeder in Israel and other avian predators of birds are rare in Israel (Shirihai 1996).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…3e), are also consistent with a structured distribution, and refute the idea that individuals regularly switch between offshore and nearshore areas. That nearshore foragers had lower API than the ones further from shore may be because these individuals respond to the higher predation danger by reducing body mass (mass-dependent predation risk; Carrascal & Polo, 1999;Gosler, Greenwood, & Perrins, 1995;Lima, 1986), just as we found in an indoor experiment with red knots (van den Hout et al, 2010). Yet, we cannot exclude the possibility that their low APIs reflect a hunger state caused by foraging constraints (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Sparrowhawks are the main avian predator of birds in Britain (Newton 1986) and frequently eat great tits (Cresswell 1995). Sparrowhawk density (Gosler et al 1995) as well as their presence or absence experimentally (Gentle & Gosler 2001;MacLeod et al 2005b) has been shown to affect the body mass of great tits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great tit (Parus major) mass has been to shown to decrease with decreased starvation risk (Gosler 1996;Gosler & Carruthers 1999), increased predator abundance (Gosler et al 1995) and increased predator attack rate (Gentle & Gosler 2001), and recent papers have established that great tits can show both mass gain (MacLeod & Gosler 2006) and loss (MacLeod et al 2005b) in response to predation risk, which is likely to be dependent on environmental conditions (MacLeod et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%