Predator effects on a detritus‐based food web are primarily mediated by non‐trophic interactions

Abstract

Summary1. Predator effects on ecosystems can extend far beyond their prey and are often not solely lethally transmitted. Change in prey traits in response to predation risk can have important repercussions on community assembly and key ecosystem processes (i.e. trait-mediated indirect effects). In addition, some predators themselves alter habitat structure or nutrient cycling through ecological engineering effects. Tracking these non-trophic pathways is thus an important, yet challenging task to gain a better grasp of the functional role of predators. 2. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that, in detritus-based food webs, non-trophic interactions may prevail over purely trophic interactions in determining predator effects on plant litter decomposition. This hypothesis was tested in a headwater stream by modulating the density of a flatworm predator (Polycelis felina) in enclosures containing oak (Quercus robur) leaf litter exposed to natural colonization by small invertebrates and microbial decomposers. Causal path modelling was used to infer how predator effects propagated through the food web. 3. Flatworms accelerated litter decomposition through positive effects on microbial decomposers. The biomass of prey and non-prey invertebrates was not negatively affected by flatworms, suggesting that net predator effect on litter decomposition was primarily determined by non-trophic interactions. 4. Flatworms enhanced the deposition and retention of fine sediments on leaf surface, thereby improving leaf colonization by invertebrates -most of which having strong affinities with interstitial habitats. This predator-induced improvement of habitat availability was attributed to the sticky nature of the mucus that flatworms secrete in copious amount while foraging. Results of path analyses further indicated that this bottom-up ecological engineering effect was as powerful as the top-down effect on invertebrate prey. 5. Our findings suggest that predators have the potential to affect substantially carbon flow and nutrient cycling in detritus-based ecosystems and that this impact cannot be fully appreciated without considering non-trophic effects.

Long-term deer exclosure alters soil properties, plant traits, understory plant community and insect herbivory, but not the functional relationships among them

“…This type of structural equation model is robust, does not rely on normal distribution or independence of data, and can be performed with limited data (Chin and Dibbern 2010). Further, it allows for the calculation of latent variables and the paths between them, and therefore avoids an unnecessarily confusing number of paths (Majdi et al 2014, Musseau et al 2015). The creation of latent variables from measured variables (e.g., the latent variable “soil properties” consisted of the measured variables SOM, water content, NH 4 -N) allows for broad conclusions to be reached about the effect that interrelated variables have on different sets of reflective variables.…”

Girardia dorotocephala transcriptome sequence, assembly, and validation through characterization of piwi homologs and stem cell progeny markers

“…Planarians have also been the subject of recent work in toxicology, as well as behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary biology research (Alvarez-Presas et al, 2008; Hagstrom et al, 2016, 2015; Hicks et al, 2006; Inoue et al, 2015; Levin et al, 2016; Lombardo et al, 2011; Majdi et al, 2014; Shomrat and Levin, 2013), broadening their use as a model beyond fields related to developmental biology. In the classroom, these charismatic organisms have been an important component in K-12 science education and tools are being developed to modernize their use in college level courses (Accorsi et al, 2017; Eberhardt et al, 2015; Pagan et al, 2009; Valverde, 2015).…”

Field exclusion of large soil predators impacts lower trophic levels and decreases leaf‐litter decomposition in dry forests

“…This initially perplexing pattern has at least two possible non‐mutually exclusive and parsimonious explanations, which are fully detailed in Figure . First, non‐consumptive effects (Majdi, Boiché, Traunspurger, & Lecerf, ; Schmitz, Krivan, & Ovadia, ; Werner & Peacor, ) likely contributed to part of the trophic cascade pattern in this system. For example, small predators may have increased their foraging activity when apex predators were removed, leading to decreased densities of their prey (e.g.…”