2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictability-based collective class association rule mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…K. Song et al [27] investigate the predictive ability of candidate rules for the first time and design a novel AC mining approach, called predictability-based collective class association rule (PCAR), to construct a classifier with high predictability by properly using cross-validation and aggregating the final rules. Theoretical analysis and experiments show their PCAR method only preserves the candidate rules with high predictability and removes the useless, redundant and low predictable rules simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K. Song et al [27] investigate the predictive ability of candidate rules for the first time and design a novel AC mining approach, called predictability-based collective class association rule (PCAR), to construct a classifier with high predictability by properly using cross-validation and aggregating the final rules. Theoretical analysis and experiments show their PCAR method only preserves the candidate rules with high predictability and removes the useless, redundant and low predictable rules simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mlakar et al (2017) presented a single-objective binary cuckoo search using a novel individual representation. Other works can be found in (Pears & Koh, 2011;Song & Lee, 2017;Anuradha & Kumar, 2017;Feng et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2017;Vo, Pham, Le & Deng, 2017;Kieu, Vo, Le, Deng & Le, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtain all the FPs (initial candidate rule set), we can measure the prediction power of a frequent pattern by calculating the prediction rate. First, we divide the training dataset into k equal-length folds along base station dimension and produce k loops using k equal-length folds [10], in each loop i, we create inner training set TRi with (k-1) folds and inner testing set TEi with 1 fold. For each candidate pattern P, we calculate the ratio pi of the P's support in TRi to patterns' amount of same size in TRi and the ratio qi of the Q's (P's prefix-path) support in TEi to patterns' amount of same size in TEi.…”
Section: Several Criteria Of Rule Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hernndez-Len [9] introduced the use of Netconf measure instead of support and confidence, then proposed an approach to rule ranking by combining Netconf with rules of a long length. Kiburm Song [10] applied cross-validation and aggregating rules to select ARs, defined a new concept of predict rate to measure algorithm prediction performance, removing redundant and low predictive power rules. In this paper, we propose a new comprehensive evaluation criterion of association rules including the predict rate to select the reliable rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%