1973
DOI: 10.1177/070674377301800304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictability of Family Therapists' Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The foundation of the McMaster Model is the Family Categories Schema (Epstein & Levin, 1973). The contributions of the McMaster group are the systematized way of classifying and observing family behavior, the research generated on the predictability of family therapists' behavior (Sigal, Guttman, Chagoya, & Lasry, 1973), and the consistent theoretical and practical implementation of a well-defined model of training.…”
Section: Goals Of Training and Supervision And Skills Of The Supervisormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The foundation of the McMaster Model is the Family Categories Schema (Epstein & Levin, 1973). The contributions of the McMaster group are the systematized way of classifying and observing family behavior, the research generated on the predictability of family therapists' behavior (Sigal, Guttman, Chagoya, & Lasry, 1973), and the consistent theoretical and practical implementation of a well-defined model of training.…”
Section: Goals Of Training and Supervision And Skills Of The Supervisormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…October 1978 (1977) Beal (1976) Beatman (1964) Birchler (1975) Bodin (1969) Bodin (1972) Bowen (1978) Cleghorn & Levin (1973) Cohen, et al (1976) Colman (1965) Constantine (1976) Dell, et. a1 (1977) Dillon (1976) Ehrlich ( Sigal, et al (1973) Stanton (…”
Section: Journal Of Marriage and Family Counselingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hollis (1968a), who used a verbal interaction typology developed earlier (Hollis, 1967(Hollis, , 1968b, found that caseworkers who used more reflective comments instead of directive and ventilative comments in the initial joint couple interviews had lower rates of discontinuance. In a similar vein, Postner, Buttman, , who used a process coding scheme developed at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal for studying verbal interaction in family therapy (Guttman, Sigal, & Chagoya, 1972;Guttman, Spector, Sigal, Rakoff, & Epstein, 1971;Sigal, Guttman, Chagoya, & Lasry, 1973;Sigal, Rakoff, & Epstein, 1967;Spector, Guttman, Sigal, Rakoff, & Epstein, 1970), examined the effects of therapist directive (D) statements (stimulating interaction, information gathering, giving support) and interpretation (I) statements (clarifying motivation, labeling unconscious motivation). The DirectiveInterpretation ratio decreased as therapy progressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies by Alexander et al (1976), and Sigal et al, (1967and Sigal et al, ( , 1973 indicate that the family therapist must generally be prepared to be active in sessions and provide some structuring relatively early in the course of family therapy but at the same time be careful to avoid assaulting family defences too soon (Gurman and Kniskern, 1 9 7 8~) .…”
Section: Involving Children In Therapy-initial Tacticsmentioning
confidence: 99%