2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted versus measured resting energy expenditure in patients requiring home parenteral nutrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both were studies with critically-ill ICU patients. Evaluating patients with intestinal failure using parenteral nutrition at home, Ławiński et al 27 found a variability closer to that of our study (8% ± 7%), when evaluating two REE measures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Both were studies with critically-ill ICU patients. Evaluating patients with intestinal failure using parenteral nutrition at home, Ławiński et al 27 found a variability closer to that of our study (8% ± 7%), when evaluating two REE measures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Predicted and measured BMR have been compared in various patient populations, but to our knowledge, only 1 recent study has investigated the accuracy of predicted BMR in patients with IF on HPN. In this study, Ławiński and coworkers 24 found that the Ireton‐Jones equation and the ESPEN 20‐kcal/kg/d recommendation provided the most accurate estimates of BMR. These results were not reproduced in the present study, in which the Ireton‐Jones equation overestimated the BMR, and the ESPEN 20‐kcal/kg/d recommendation underestimated the BMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Another study by Lawinski et al . evaluated 76 patients with outpatient PN, documenting that, in cases with no IC, calculating the estimation using 0.84 MJ kg –1 (20 kcal kg −1 ) or the Ireton‐Jones equation may be a good option; however, the study focused on patients with malnutrition and intestinal failure . Boullata et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study by Lawinski et al (28) evaluated 76 patients with outpatient PN, documenting that, in cases with no IC, calculating the estimation using 0.84 MJ kg -1 (20 kcal kg À1 ) or the Ireton-Jones equation may be a good option; however, the study focused on patients with malnutrition and intestinal failure (28) . Boullata et al (7) retrospectively evaluated 395 hospitalised patients and concluded that the most accurate predictive equation was the Harris-Benedict (without adding stressors because they increased the error), although they did not accurately predict measures in 39% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%