2017
DOI: 10.3151/jact.15.644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Bond Strength between FRP Plates and Concrete Sub-strate: Applications of GMDH and MNLR Approaches

Abstract: Debonding of the fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement due to shear stresses is a very significant issue in design of concrete structures. Several experimental and theoretical investigations have been carried out to produce a relationship between the shear bond strength and the governing variables. However, existing empirical models do not provide an accurate prediction due to the complexity of the debonding process. In the present study, group method of data handling (GMDH) network as a novel machine l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BPNN displayed a good potential usage. Hamze-Ziabari and Yasavoli 170 used group method of data handling and multivariate nonlinear regression to predict the bond strength between FRP plates and concrete substrate based on 342 experimental databases. The model reasonably predicted the bond strength, as it outperformed other existing statistical models.…”
Section: Heuristic Models Of Frp–concrete Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BPNN displayed a good potential usage. Hamze-Ziabari and Yasavoli 170 used group method of data handling and multivariate nonlinear regression to predict the bond strength between FRP plates and concrete substrate based on 342 experimental databases. The model reasonably predicted the bond strength, as it outperformed other existing statistical models.…”
Section: Heuristic Models Of Frp–concrete Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group method of data handling (GMDH) networks was investigated to measure the bond strength and perform a comparison with multiple linear and nonlinear regression models [21]. The GMDH model proved to outperform other models and improve accuracy [22]. An artificial neural network (ANN)-based model was built to predict the bond strength of concrete [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, certain empirical prediction models were devised and incorporated in relevant design codes based on theoretical analysis and experimental validation. However, most of these models were developed using limited experiment datasets, which may make them exact within these data space but lack sufficient generalization capacity for other parameter settings [ 27 , 28 ]. An example is the standard empirical model reported in the American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 440 Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars that was used to traditionally estimate the BS of FRP (ACI 440.1 R-06 [ 29 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of computer science and the increasing volume of associated experimental datasets, data-driven approaches based on machine learning (ML) algorithms have recently emerged as alternative methods for establishing prediction models using comprehensive experimental data and information [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Some of the most commonly and successfully deployed ML algorithms for estimating the BS of FRP are artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machines (SVMs), multiple linear regression (MLR), genetic and evolutionary algorithms (GEAs), random forest (RF), and ensemble learning (gradient boosted regression trees [GBRT]) [ 18 , 27 , 28 , 35 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Thakur et al [ 13 ] proposed a bagged M5P tree regression model out of six different models for the prediction of the bonding strength of FRP bars embedded in concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%