2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting cancer on excision of atypical ductal hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have associated the presence of a micropapillary growth pattern of ADH on core biopsy with upgrade rates to DCIS on excision [13,30,32]. The studies by Ely et al and Wagoner et al both found a strong association between micropapillary ADH on core biopsy with upgrade to cancer, whereas Doren et al and our current study did not find a significant association with upgrade.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have associated the presence of a micropapillary growth pattern of ADH on core biopsy with upgrade rates to DCIS on excision [13,30,32]. The studies by Ely et al and Wagoner et al both found a strong association between micropapillary ADH on core biopsy with upgrade to cancer, whereas Doren et al and our current study did not find a significant association with upgrade.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Additional smaller studies have associated the reported degree of "severity" of histologic features of ADH as a predictor of carcinoma on excision report similar findings [13,[33][34][35]. Most of these studies have attempted to classify the severity of ADH on core biopsy using a 3-tiered system of "mild," "moderate," and "marked atypia" [13,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Les essais de prévention du tamoxifène ont montré une réduction de 38 % (IC 95 % : [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] ; p < 0,0001) de l'incidence des CS. Il n'y avait pas d'efp < 0,0001) de l'incidence des CS.…”
Section: Méta-analyse De Cuzick [32] (Tableaux 12-14)unclassified