2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting distribution of major forest tree species to potential impacts of climate change in the central Himalayan region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, SDMs have been used to model invasive species habitat suitability and proliferation (Roura-Pascual et al, 2008;Poulus et al, 2012;Thuiller and Richardson, 2005), recommend areas for threatened and/or endangered species (Bombi et al, 2009;Puschendorf et al, 2009) and predict distribution of native or endemic species (Evangelista et al, 2008). Similar to this effort are reports on the projection of species distribution into future conditions using global circulation models representing various climate scenarios (Nabout et al, 2010;Yates et al, 2009;Khanum et al, 2013;Chakraborty et al, 2016). We evaluated several algorithms and used the best performing ones with worldwide occurrence data to produce suitability A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T 4 maps using climate datasets representing future climate change scenarios based on representative concentration pathways (RCP2.6 and 8.5) for the years 2050 and 2070.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, SDMs have been used to model invasive species habitat suitability and proliferation (Roura-Pascual et al, 2008;Poulus et al, 2012;Thuiller and Richardson, 2005), recommend areas for threatened and/or endangered species (Bombi et al, 2009;Puschendorf et al, 2009) and predict distribution of native or endemic species (Evangelista et al, 2008). Similar to this effort are reports on the projection of species distribution into future conditions using global circulation models representing various climate scenarios (Nabout et al, 2010;Yates et al, 2009;Khanum et al, 2013;Chakraborty et al, 2016). We evaluated several algorithms and used the best performing ones with worldwide occurrence data to produce suitability A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T 4 maps using climate datasets representing future climate change scenarios based on representative concentration pathways (RCP2.6 and 8.5) for the years 2050 and 2070.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides, we downloaded corresponding layers of the period 2021-2040 from CGIAR web portal (http://www.ccafs-clima te.org) for the subsequent migration analysis. Like other studies (Chakraborty, Joshi, & Sachdeva, 2016;Zhang, Yao, Meng, & Tao, 2018), we assumed SR and WS to remain unchanged when projected into the future. Finally, all raster data were extracted to the regional extent of the study area with ArcGIS 10.3 (Esri).…”
Section: Yalung Tsangpomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…forests, and (ii) pine (Pinus spp.) forests (Chakraborty et al 2016c). The site selection of the two locations, V Oak and V Pine , was based on identified forest patches likely to undergo changes in their geographical distribution under uncertain future climate scenarios ( Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have also reported significant forest cover changes in the central Himalayan region (Gairola et al 2013;Mishra and Chaudhuri 2015). Such changes in forests have often been attributed to either anthropogenic pressures, such as increasing population causing forest loss in the past Chakraborty et al 2016b;Batar et al 2017;Chakraborty et al 2017), or natural causes such as climate change that are likely to alter potential distribution of forests in the future (Rashid et al 2015;Upgupta et al 2015;Bhatta and Vetaas 2016;Chakraborty et al 2016c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%