2020
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Factors for Oncological and Functional Outcome in Hypopharyngeal Cancer

Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy, with low survival rates and high incidence of tumor and treatment‐related morbidity. This study aims to analyze the long‐term oncologic and functional outcomes of a large cohort of patients and to determine prognostic factors. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Methods The records of all patients diagnosed with hypopharyngeal SCC and treated with curative intent at our tertiary referral center were rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…high, p = 0.009; HR = 0.516, 95% CI 0.313–0.848). Besides, multivariate analysis also disclosed that N2–3 and age ≥60 were correlated with worse prognosis, and these results were consistent with previous study ( 15 , 48 , 49 ). Based on the findings above, patients with high LDH, N2–3 and age ≥60 tend to experience worse survival outcomes, and this group of patients may need to adopt more intensive follow-up care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…high, p = 0.009; HR = 0.516, 95% CI 0.313–0.848). Besides, multivariate analysis also disclosed that N2–3 and age ≥60 were correlated with worse prognosis, and these results were consistent with previous study ( 15 , 48 , 49 ). Based on the findings above, patients with high LDH, N2–3 and age ≥60 tend to experience worse survival outcomes, and this group of patients may need to adopt more intensive follow-up care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our finding differs from those of some studies, 3,19 but is consistent with Bugter's study, in which 5‐year OS rate was 46.8% in patients with metachronous multiple primary tumors 10 . This may be because of 1), the median interval between the Met‐SPMs and index tumor was 29.3 months (IQR 22.0–47.3), the long control time of the index tumor facilitated metachronous second primary malignancies development, patients without second primary malignancies had a high risk of locoregional failure within 2 years, with a 2‐year OS rate of only 40–60% 21–23 . More than half of metachronous second primary malignancies (52.5%) were in early stage due to our regular follow‐up, which is easy to treat and so far not influence the prognosis of index tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Unfortunately, there is no stable prediction model. Clinicopathological characteristics currently used as prognostic indicators in clinical practice lack uniform standards and are insufficient to accurately predict the oncologic outcomes [ 7 , 8 ]. New biomarkers may provide more accurate risk stratification of recurrence and metastasis than clinicopathological characteristics and allow more sensitive disease monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%