1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-1882(97)83111-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting log removal performance of membrane systems using in-situ integrity testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its large active area combined with a small footprint, hollow fiber modules have great potential in commercial applications [33]. Although broken hollow fibers cannot be replaced, they can be detected by the liquid decay test (LDT) [38][39][40] and pinned to remove broken fibers from service. Good flow distribution on the shell side can be difficult to achieve, with subsequent high degrees of temperature polarization.…”
Section: Configurations Of MD Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its large active area combined with a small footprint, hollow fiber modules have great potential in commercial applications [33]. Although broken hollow fibers cannot be replaced, they can be detected by the liquid decay test (LDT) [38][39][40] and pinned to remove broken fibers from service. Good flow distribution on the shell side can be difficult to achieve, with subsequent high degrees of temperature polarization.…”
Section: Configurations Of MD Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDT is first used to detect any breaches in the module, and AST is then used to accurately pinpoint the location of the defect so the membrane can be isolated for replacement or repairs (Johnson, 1998). This technique entails the use of an accelerometer to detect the vibrations generated by air leaks in the membrane module.…”
Section: Acoustic Sound Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods are surrogate measures of integrity that involve filtrate water quality monitoring such that a significant decline in filtrate quality may indicate an integrity problem. Both direct integrity testing and continuous indirect integrity monitoring are required for compliance with US EPA regulations (13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Chemical Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12): Generally, in order to identify changes in productivity (as measured by flux) that are specifically attributable to membrane fouling, it is desirable to normalize the flux for pressure as well as temperature, as shown in Eq. (13). Note that the temperature-and pressurenormalized flux is often referred to as either the specific flux or permeability.…”
Section: Mf Uf and Mcf Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%