Predicting Mathematical Learning Difficulties Status: The Role of Domain-Specific and Domain-General Skills

Abstract

This study investigated which domain-specific and domain-general skills measured at grade 1 predict mathematical learning difficulties (MLD) status at grade 3. We used different cut-off criteria and measures of mathematics performance for defining the MLD status. Norwegian children’s (N = 206) numeracy, cognitive, and language skills were measured at grade 1 and arithmetic fluency and curriculum-based mathematics (CBM) at grade 3. Logistic regression analyses showed that symbolic numerical magnitude processing, verbal counting, and rapid automatized naming predicted MLD25 status (performance ≤ 25th percentile) based on arithmetic fluency, whereas verbal counting skills and nonverbal reasoning predicted the status based on CBM. The same predictors were found for MLD10 status (performance ≤ 10th percentile), and in addition, rapid automatized naming also predicted the status based on CBM. Only symbolic numerical magnitude processing and verbal counting predicted LOW status (performance between 11–25th percentile) based on arithmetic fluency, whereas nonverbal reasoning and working memory predicted LOW status based on CBM. Different cut-off scores and mathematics measures used for the definition of MLD status are important to acknowledge, as these seem to lead to relatively significant variation in which students are identified as having MLD and which factors contribute to the MLD status.

iSeeNumbers project report - Main findings and recommendations for practice

“…Reference to the original article: Throndsen, T. U., Lindskog, M., Niemivirta, M., & Mononen, R. (2022). Does mathematics anxiety moderate the effect of problem difficulty on cognitive effort?…”

On religious practices as multiscale active inference: Certainties emerging from recurrent interactions within and across individuals and groups

“…Accordingly, researchers argue that cognitive neuroscience has undergone a Kuhnian shift away from the Modularity of the Mind (mostly bottom-up) toward predictive accounts of cognition that emphasise and formalise recursive relationships in which the relative dominance of bottom-up and top-down influences varies dynamically (Asprem, 2019). Predictive accounts of cognition have become predominant as explanations of cognitive processes based on a large amount of scientific evidence for the role of domain-general over domain-specific processing, disputing the information encapsulation supposed by the Modularity of the Mind (Kalén et al 2021, Nair et al 2021Mononen, Gerlach et al 2022;Niemivirta and Korhonen, 2022;Saito et al 2022). Another scientific finding challenging the Modularity of the Mind framework is the role of top-down effects on lower-level cognition.…”

The association between physical activity during preschool hours and early numeracy

“…EN is shown to strongly predict later mathematical competence (Jordan et al, 2007;Morgan et al, 2009) and academic achievement in general (Duncan et al, 2007). Furthermore, low performance in EN has shown to be precursor for later mathematical learning difficulties (Kiss et al, 2019;Mononen et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2020). Thus, it is important to study and support the development of children's EN.…”