2020
DOI: 10.4218/etrij.2019-0443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting numeric ratings for Google apps using text features and ensemble learning

Abstract: Application (app) ratings are feedback provided voluntarily by users and serve as important evaluation criteria for apps. However, these ratings can often be biased owing to insufficient or missing votes. Additionally, significant differences have been observed between numeric ratings and user reviews. This study aims to predict the numeric ratings of Google apps using machine learning classifiers. It exploits numeric app ratings provided by users as training data and returns authentic mobile app ratings by an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, study [48] uses a stack generalization technique and ensemble learning approach for pulsar prediction. Similarly, ensemble approaches are also used for predicting the numeric scores for Google apps in [49]. Hybrid or ensemble approaches are also used for text analysis [50].…”
Section: Proposed Methodology For Pulsar Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, study [48] uses a stack generalization technique and ensemble learning approach for pulsar prediction. Similarly, ensemble approaches are also used for predicting the numeric scores for Google apps in [49]. Hybrid or ensemble approaches are also used for text analysis [50].…”
Section: Proposed Methodology For Pulsar Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the proposed deep SVM is carried out with other selected machine learning models. These models are selected with regards to the results reported in the existing literature [52][53][54]. From this perspective, RF, LR, ETC, GBM, and SGD are implemented for performance comparison.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above-discussed models, this study proposes a voting classifier to enhance the prediction accuracy. The voting classifier is an ensemble model that combines different base models to make the final predictions as voting classifiers tend to show better performance than individual models [45]- [48]. This study uses SVM, RF, and K-NN as sub-estimators and final predictions are obtained using both hard and soft voting methods.…”
Section: ) Prediction Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%