2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting progression of Alzheimer’s disease using forward-to-backward bi-directional network with integrative imputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After tuning the model's parameters, the accuracy improved to ∼80%. Previously, the best accuracy to classify AD as progressive or nonprogressive was 58.47% [ 23 ]. The achieved accuracy with AdaBoost with effective preprocessing has improved by 21.34% compared to the literature, reaching 80%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After tuning the model's parameters, the accuracy improved to ∼80%. Previously, the best accuracy to classify AD as progressive or nonprogressive was 58.47% [ 23 ]. The achieved accuracy with AdaBoost with effective preprocessing has improved by 21.34% compared to the literature, reaching 80%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model with the baseline work presented in Ho et al [ 23 ], Table 5 provides the accuracy, precision, and recall of both models for AD progression and nonprogression classification, respectively. There is a significant increase in the observed accuracy with AdaBoost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous neurologists and medical researchers are currently devoting significant work to developing procedures for early diagnosis of AD, with consistently encouraging findings 12 . In recent decades, several studies have been proposed for automatic detection of AD 6 , 13 16 . Various neuroimaging signals such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 17 , 18 , functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) 19 , 20 , positron emission tomography (PET) 21 , 22 , electroencephalography (EEG) 23 – 25 , and magnetoencephalography (MEG) 26 , 27 have been investigated to determine if there are any anomalous clustering coefficients or distinctive path lengths in the brain networks of AD patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%