2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(01)00572-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting secondary progression in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a Bayesian analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
91
3
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
91
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in accordance with the vast majority of the literature [8][9][10] , our fi ndings confi rmed that clinical factors, such as onset at a late age and a short interval between onset and secondary progression, increased the risk of an unfavourable course. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, in accordance with the vast majority of the literature [8][9][10] , our fi ndings confi rmed that clinical factors, such as onset at a late age and a short interval between onset and secondary progression, increased the risk of an unfavourable course. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most were consistent with either observations from previously published natural history studies 17,21 or with clinical expectations. For instance, consistent with the wider literature, 47 those who were older at MS onset tended to have greater disability (higher EDSS scores) and worsened somewhat more rapidly over time. Consistent with clinical expectations, those with SP disease had a higher EDSS score at ABN eligibility.…”
Section: Key Findingssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Relapses presenting with pyramidal tract and sphincter disorders have a poor long-term prognosis when compared with relapses without involvement of these systems (39,40,41,42).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%