Predicting Spontaneous Big Five Behavior with Implicit Association Tests

Steffens, Melanie C.; König, Stefanie

doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.13

Cited by 152 publications

(109 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Further evidence indicates more generally that the influence of affective responses to stimuli on behaviour increases under time pressured conditions (Shiv, and Fedorikhin, 2002). In a similar way, implicit attitudes are found to be better predictors of spontaneous rather than deliberate behaviour (Asendorpf, Banse and Mucke, 2002;Steffens and Konig, 2006;Spence and Townsend, in press). It is possible that further refinement of the measurement of these constructs may enable purer measurements of spontaneous processes.…”

Section: Spontaneitymentioning

confidence: 82%

Spontaneous evaluations: Similarities and differences between the affect heuristic and implicit attitudes

Spence

Townsend

2007

Cognition and Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk 2 AbstractThe affect heuristic and implicit attitudes are two separate concepts that have arisen within different literatures but that have a number of similarities. This paper compares these two constructs with the aim of clarifying exactly what they are and how these relate to one another. By comparing and contrasting the affect heuristic and implicit attitudes we conclude that the 'affect pool' of images tagged with feelings referred to within the affect heuristic literature may be equivalent to the construct of implicit attitudes. Further to this, the affect heuristic itself could be considered as a specific sub-type of spontaneous process that is driven by implicit attitudes. We propose that each of the implicit attitude and affect heuristic constructs could be further developed through the examination and comparison of existing literatures surrounding the other. Implications for future research are outlined.3

show abstract

Section: Spontaneitymentioning

confidence: 82%

Spontaneous evaluations: Similarities and differences between the affect heuristic and implicit attitudes

Spence

Townsend

2007

Cognition and Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since we wanted to investigate the impact of knowledge about faking strategies on the dissociable IAT effects, we needed a primary data set in which naïve and informed faking could be compared with each other. Third, the IAT used in the previous study (i.e., the extraversion IAT) is a frequently used and very popular IAT (e.g., Grumm & von Collani, 2007;Schmukle, Back, & Egloff, 2008;Steffens & Schulze-König, 2006). Last but not least, as 84 participants were included in this study an a priori power analysis using G*Power 3.1.7 (Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, & Buchner, 2007) revealed a power of nearly 100% (.998) for ANOVAs with repeated measures to detect a moderate effect size.…”

Section: Data For Reanalysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Röhner

Ewers

2015

Behav Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent research has indicated that diffusion model analyses allow the user to decompose the traditional IAT effect (D measure) into three newly developed IAT effects: IAT v , which has already been shown to be significantly related to the construct-related variance of the IAT effect, and IAT a and IAT t0 , both of which have been assumed to provide an indication of faking. But research on the impacts of faking on IAT v , IAT a , and IAT t0 is still warranted. By reanalyzing a data set containing both faked and unfaked IAT effects, we investigated whether diffusion model analyses could be used to separate construct-related variance from faking-related variance on the IAT. Our results revealed that this separation is not yet possible. As had already been shown for the traditional IAT effect, IAT v was affected by faking. Interestingly, it was affected by faking only under more difficult faking conditions (i.e., when participants were asked to fake without being given recommended strategies for how to do so, and when they were requested to fake high scores). By contrast, IAT a was affected by faking only in the comparably easy faking condition (i.e., when participants had been informed about possible faking strategies and were asked to fake low scores). IAT t0 was not affected by faking at all. Our results show that although diffusion model analyses cannot yet provide a clear separation between construct-and faking-related variance, they allow us to peer into the black box of the faking process itself, and thus provide a useful tool for analyzing and interpreting IAT scores.

show abstract

“…В соответствии с многопараметрическим ком-плексным анализом 35 В такои� ситуации мы осуществили эксплораторныи� факторныи� анализ и получили 2-факторное реше-ние (табл. 2), объяснившее 57.68% дисперсии.…”

Section: результатыunclassified

Щебетенко С.А., Вайнштейн С.В. Большая Пятерка Черт Личности: Эксплицитно-Имплицитный Подход

2014

Психология И Психотехника

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

При цитировании этой статьи ссылка на doi обязательнаС реди различных таксономии� черт личности наибольшим признанием в последние деся-тилетия пользуется так называемая Боль-шая Пяте� рка, включающая в себя экстра-версию, доброжелательность, добросовестность, неи� ротизм и открытость опыту 1 . В подавляющем большинстве проведенных исследовании� Большая Пяте� рка изучалась посредством самоотчетных те-стов. Они представляют собои� либо экспертные оценки 2 , либо -что чаще -вопросники и списки Аннотация. В статье представлено корреляционное исследование черт личности в соответствии с предположением о двух уровнях обработки социальной информации индивидом: эксплицитном (цен-тральном) и имплицитном (ассоциативном

show abstract

Predicting Spontaneous Big Five Behavior with Implicit Association Tests

Cited by 152 publications

References 30 publications

Spontaneous evaluations: Similarities and differences between the affect heuristic and implicit attitudes

Spontaneous evaluations: Similarities and differences between the affect heuristic and implicit attitudes

Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Щебетенко С.А., Вайнштейн С.В. Большая Пятерка Черт Личности: Эксплицитно-Имплицитный Подход

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About