2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2007.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: Development of selection criteria and initial experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)14,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) The attrition diagram for our study depicting the search process is shown in Fig. 2 Table III.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(2,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)14,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) The attrition diagram for our study depicting the search process is shown in Fig. 2 Table III.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the general concern for the high doses of radiation associated with CCTA, various dose-saving strategies were found to have been introduced in the literature, with the (3,(35)(36)(37) Although the present analysis did not focus on studies using retrospective ECG-gated CCTA, radiation dose reports from previous studies confirm that effective doses were significantly reduced by prospective ECG gating (3.6 mSv) when compared to retrospective ECG gating (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). (23,38) Several other studies on radiation doses also indicate that prospective ECG-gated CCTA leads to a dose reduction of up to 83% when compared to retrospective ECG gating.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations