2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2023.140358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the HOMO-LUMO gap of benzenoid polycyclic hydrocarbons via interpretable machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most machine learning models developed for HOMO–LUMO gaps have been those for organic structures. For example, Zheng et al have previously created machine learning models for benzenoid polycyclic hydrocarbons. Also for organic compounds, von Lilienfeld and co-workers developed models with prediction errors of ∼0.1 eV and showcased methods for achieving improved data efficiency, which is often problematic in HOMO–LUMO gap models. Zhang and Aires-de-Sousa created a B3LYP structure and HOMO and LUMO energy database for tens of thousands of organic structures and then trained a variety of machine learning models and found accuracy up to 0.15 eV.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most machine learning models developed for HOMO–LUMO gaps have been those for organic structures. For example, Zheng et al have previously created machine learning models for benzenoid polycyclic hydrocarbons. Also for organic compounds, von Lilienfeld and co-workers developed models with prediction errors of ∼0.1 eV and showcased methods for achieving improved data efficiency, which is often problematic in HOMO–LUMO gap models. Zhang and Aires-de-Sousa created a B3LYP structure and HOMO and LUMO energy database for tens of thousands of organic structures and then trained a variety of machine learning models and found accuracy up to 0.15 eV.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, unsupervised learning techniques such as t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding and principal component analysis excel in extracting meaningful descriptors through data-driven insights [118,134] (Figure 2). These MLidentified descriptors, in turn, serve as valuable, interpretable inputs for predictive ML models to predict various material properties across different discipline [135,136] For instance, these models successfully predicted HOMO-LUMO gaps [137] and identified descriptors associated with volcano plots, [138,139] reactivity, [114,[140][141][142][143] and electronic properties of transition metal complexes [144] in the field of homogeneous catalysis. In solid-state chemistry, these models have been leveraged to study the material properties of crystals, [145,146] construct phase diagrams, [147] assess the redox potentials of Li-ion batteries, [148] and evaluate thermodynamic stability.…”
Section: Descriptor-based and Interpretable ML Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine learning techniques, particularly computer vision, have emerged as promising tools in material science research for automating the analysis and processing of image data [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Machine learning has achieved remarkable advancements even in the field of medical and biological sciences [26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%