2012
DOI: 10.1177/0021998312462616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates under triaxial loading: Correlation with experimental results

Abstract: This article represents our contribution to Part B of the 2nd Worldwide Failure Exercise (WWFE-II), where comparisons between epoxy/lamina/laminate response and failure predictions, based on maximum strain failure criterion, and experimental results are made. Correlations between actual test data and our nonlinear stress-strain response and failure envelope predictions under multi-axial loading for 12 different case studies are presented and discussed. Although our approach to modeling composite failure ranked… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between analysis and test results were explained by deficiencies with respect to matrix-dominant failure. The maximum strain criterion in conjunction with plasticity used by Bogetti et al [20,21] delivered good results in the WWFE-I; the strengthening effect that appears under tri-axial loading or hydrostatic pressure, however, is obviously not well captured as has been admitted by Bogetti et al [22]. Furthermore, Bogetti's theory predicts a completely closed failure envelope even for isotropic materials.…”
Section: Fig 2 Maximum Stressmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Differences between analysis and test results were explained by deficiencies with respect to matrix-dominant failure. The maximum strain criterion in conjunction with plasticity used by Bogetti et al [20,21] delivered good results in the WWFE-I; the strengthening effect that appears under tri-axial loading or hydrostatic pressure, however, is obviously not well captured as has been admitted by Bogetti et al [22]. Furthermore, Bogetti's theory predicts a completely closed failure envelope even for isotropic materials.…”
Section: Fig 2 Maximum Stressmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Comparisons with the experimental data will be made and published for Part B of WWFE-II. 32 One of the limitations of the present approach, based on maximum strain failure criterion, is that it may not be able to predict and model growth/propagation of damage in composite laminates, due to its limited post failure capability. Currently, there is a huge amount of effort being put in by the community to develop fracture mechanics based models (for example, cohesive zone models) for such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between analysis and test results are explained by deficiencies with respect to matrix-dominant failure. The maximum strain criterion in conjunction with plasticity used by Bogetti et al 24,25 delivered good results in the WWFE-I; the strengthening effect that appears under tri-axial loading or hydrostatic pressure, however, is obviously not well captured as has been admitted by Bogetti et al 26 Furthermore, Bogetti's theory predicts a completely closed failure envelope even for isotropic materials. Nahas 1 has referred to further non-interactive theories which to some degree account for the strength of the constituents.…”
Section: Fiber Compositementioning
confidence: 97%