1998
DOI: 10.3354/cr010051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the relative sensitivity of forest production in Ireland to site quality and climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that modelers need to be cautious when using nitrogen to scale physiological/growth parameters from leaf to tree/canopy or from tree to ecosystem levels under future climate conditions involving elevated [CO 2 ]. Nitrogen is commonly used for such up-scaling (Aber et al, 1996;Kull and Jarvis, 1996;Dang et al, 1997) and the primary productivity of forest ecosystems (Aber and Federer, 1992;Sellers et al, 1992;Goodale et al, 1998;Zak et al, 2003;Pan et al, 2004). It was worthy to note that the CO 2 elevation reduced LMR but increased the SMR and RMR with increasing N supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results suggest that modelers need to be cautious when using nitrogen to scale physiological/growth parameters from leaf to tree/canopy or from tree to ecosystem levels under future climate conditions involving elevated [CO 2 ]. Nitrogen is commonly used for such up-scaling (Aber et al, 1996;Kull and Jarvis, 1996;Dang et al, 1997) and the primary productivity of forest ecosystems (Aber and Federer, 1992;Sellers et al, 1992;Goodale et al, 1998;Zak et al, 2003;Pan et al, 2004). It was worthy to note that the CO 2 elevation reduced LMR but increased the SMR and RMR with increasing N supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The 16 tree species included in the modelling have an array of parameters that define their respective life cycles, competitive abilities, biology, and climatic ranges (Table 2) and were obtained from several sources (Burns and Honkala 1990;Aber et al 1997;Goodale et al 1998;Scheller and Mladenoff 2005;Xu et al 2009;Bourque et al 2010), as well as from consultation with local experts in forest ecology. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the full effects of CO 2 fertilization on forest ecosystems, changes in stomatal conductance were not included in this study, a decision that is supported in other studies using PnET-II and LANDIS-II (Scheller and Mladenoff 2008;Gustafson et al 2010).…”
Section: Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has already been used in regional studies in order to predict the sensitivity of forest production to climate variability and site quality (e.g. Goodale et al, 1998). DNDC is a soil biogeochemistry model used for predicting soil organic matter decomposition, nitrogen turnover and N 2 O production in agricultural soils (Li et al, 1992).…”
Section: The Pnet-n-dndc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%