2013
DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000000031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Through-Focus Visual Acuity with the Eye’s Natural Aberrations

Abstract: Computer-based models that account for patient's aberrations, pupil diameter changes, and accommodative amplitude can be used to predict the performance of contact lens designs. With this high correlation (R² ≥ 0.90) and high level of predictability, more design options can be explored in the computer to optimize performance before a lens is manufactured and tested clinically.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ZEMAX is an optics simulation software that has been used in a variety of eye research fields [6,42]. Previously, we have used ZEMAX to simulate the visual performances of the organcultured bovine eyes in the absence and presence of conditions that altering the physiological optics of the lens [6,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ZEMAX is an optics simulation software that has been used in a variety of eye research fields [6,42]. Previously, we have used ZEMAX to simulate the visual performances of the organcultured bovine eyes in the absence and presence of conditions that altering the physiological optics of the lens [6,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the conventional GRIN formula in ZEAMX software is mathematically constrained and may not be sufficient to model the complex GRIN profiles observed in the human lens, especially older human lenses [20,27,43]. Future works to include full corneal topography, wave-front aberrometry [42], and customised the GRIN formulas [30,44] could help produce more accurate and comprehensive optical models [30,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%