2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0750-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting ultrahigh risk multiple myeloma by molecular profiling: an analysis of newly diagnosed transplant eligible myeloma XI trial patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
48
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Response to panobinostat in this study was associated with a median 20 months prolongation of PFS, and while the study was not powered to detect a statistically significant prolongation of PFS, this represents a clinically meaningful extension of PFS for those with panobinostat‐responsive disease. Importantly, a recent molecular profiling analysis from the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX 27 and XI 28 trials has demonstrated that the 33% of patients with MM with a high‐risk SKY92 (a 92‐gene prognostic signature, MMprofiler TM , SkylineDx) profile and/or two adverse risk translocations (‘double‐hit’) derive no benefit from lenalidomide maintenance 29 . This substantial proportion of patients represents a group where the excepted standard of care for maintenance is deficient and alternative, orally bioavailable agents, such as panobinostat need to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response to panobinostat in this study was associated with a median 20 months prolongation of PFS, and while the study was not powered to detect a statistically significant prolongation of PFS, this represents a clinically meaningful extension of PFS for those with panobinostat‐responsive disease. Importantly, a recent molecular profiling analysis from the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX 27 and XI 28 trials has demonstrated that the 33% of patients with MM with a high‐risk SKY92 (a 92‐gene prognostic signature, MMprofiler TM , SkylineDx) profile and/or two adverse risk translocations (‘double‐hit’) derive no benefit from lenalidomide maintenance 29 . This substantial proportion of patients represents a group where the excepted standard of care for maintenance is deficient and alternative, orally bioavailable agents, such as panobinostat need to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RNA microarray platform (MyPRS) was the first to identify distinct low‐ (LR) and high‐risk (HR) myeloma subgroups 3,4 . A second platform identified additional subgroups (EMC92) 5‐7 . Both of them predicted outcome in patients treated with conventional chemotherapy 4–6,8 …”
Section: (A) Response All Patients N (%) Gene Expression Profiling mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide mRNA-transcriptome profiling was assessed using Clariom D Human array (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). [46][47][48] A detailed description is provided within the Supplemental file. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was applied on global protein-coding gene expression profiles: significant gene sets were selected based on nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR<0.25.…”
Section: Transcriptome Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%