2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1427722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting unimolecular chemical reactions: Chemical flooding

Abstract: We present a method to predict products, transition states, and reaction paths of unimolecular chemical reactions such as dissociation or rearrangement reactions of small to medium sized molecules. The method thus provides the necessary input for established procedures to compute barrier heights and reaction rates, which conventionally have to be assumed heuristically. The method is an extension of the force field based conformational flooding procedure, but here aims at an accelerated barrier crossing of chem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid this problem, many automated TS (or minimum energy path) search methods have been developed [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Although most of these require guesses of a reaction mechanism such as key structures (product and intermediates) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] or chemically relevant collective variables [35][36][37], some (relatively expensive) methods do not use any guess [38][39][40][41][42]. We also have developed two unique methods without needing any guess: the global reaction route mapping (GRRM) [43][44][45] method and the artificial force-induced reaction (AFIR) [46][47][48] method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this problem, many automated TS (or minimum energy path) search methods have been developed [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Although most of these require guesses of a reaction mechanism such as key structures (product and intermediates) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] or chemically relevant collective variables [35][36][37], some (relatively expensive) methods do not use any guess [38][39][40][41][42]. We also have developed two unique methods without needing any guess: the global reaction route mapping (GRRM) [43][44][45] method and the artificial force-induced reaction (AFIR) [46][47][48] method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if only the educt state is known, these methods cannot be applied, and the prediction of product states becomes a real challenge. This scenario is addressed by the flooding technique, 5,8 which aims at predicting both, the unknown product state as well as the transition pathway.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artificial force induced reaction (AFIR) method has been developed for finding TSs for associative pathways among two or more components efficiently. 6567 Some approaches, such as the sphere optimization technique, 68 the iso-potential contour following method, 69 and the chemical flooding method, 70 find only a single path starting from a local minimum, where this single path often corresponds to the lowest barrier path. Moreover, there is a rigorous, deterministic approach called ¡BB global optimization method which has been applied to triatomic molecules and the conformational search in simple peptides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%