2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0027375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development: A latent variable analysis.

Abstract: The present study explored whether different executive control and speed measures (working memory, inhibition, processing speed, and naming speed) independently predict individual differences in word reading and reading comprehension. Although previous studies suggest these cognitive constructs are important for reading, we analyze the constructs simultaneously to test whether each is a unique predictor. We used latent variables from 483 participants (ages 8 to 16) to portion each cognitive and reading constru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
252
5
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(143 reference statements)
25
252
5
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in both cases, the differences in the IWS-EWS relation can be observed in the periods of an intensive development of each of these executive functions. This result is consistent with postulates of some researchers, for example, Altemeier et al (2008), about the necessity to distinguish between a lower and a higher level of executive functions, engaged at different stages of literacy development (Altemeier et al, 2008;Christopher, 2012). For inhibitory control, which belongs to basic executive functions, turned out to be important for the relation between reading and writing in the early stadium of WS development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, in both cases, the differences in the IWS-EWS relation can be observed in the periods of an intensive development of each of these executive functions. This result is consistent with postulates of some researchers, for example, Altemeier et al (2008), about the necessity to distinguish between a lower and a higher level of executive functions, engaged at different stages of literacy development (Altemeier et al, 2008;Christopher, 2012). For inhibitory control, which belongs to basic executive functions, turned out to be important for the relation between reading and writing in the early stadium of WS development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Children with dyslexia show deficits in their working memory, phonological awareness, and word reading efficiency (Berninger, Raskind, Richards, Abbott, & Stock, 2008; Brosnan et al, 2002; Swanson, Zheng, & Jerman, 2009). Working memory predicts both phonological awareness and word reading efficiency (de Abreu, Gathercole, & Martin, 2011; Berninger, Abbott, Vermeulen, & Fulton, 2006; Christopher et al, 2012; Locascio, Mahone, Eason, & Cutting, 2010; Ramscar & Gitcho, 2007). Because phonological awareness predicts word reading efficiency (Anthony & Francis, 2005; Melby‐Lervag et al, 2012), and phonological working memory is associated to word reading (Gathercole & Baddeley, 2014), working memory may be important to word reading efficiency via its impact on phonological awareness in children with dyslexia; a mediation model can be expected but has not yet been tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working memory underlies both phonological awareness and word reading efficiency, and as such, one could expect that working memory impacts reading via its effect on phonological awareness. In typically developing children, working memory has indeed been found to predict phonological awareness (de Abreu et al, 2011; Oakhill & Kyle, 2000) and word reading efficiency (Berninger, Abbott, Vermeulen, et al, 2006; Christopher et al, 2012; Locascio et al, 2010). Children with dyslexia generally show deficits in working memory and having phonological awareness and word reading efficiency problems (Berninger, Raskind, et al, 2008; Brosnan et al, 2002; Swanson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 for the correspondence between reading and EF). Reading performance has been suggested to correlate with EF skills (9). Many studies have focused on specific aspects of EF related to reading: attention shifting and inhibition (24), working memory and speed of processing (9), verbal fluency (or verb-generation ability) (25) that were all found to be correlated with reading ability (25).…”
Section: Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better the semantic abilities are, the easier it is to gain the meaning of the written word and of a written sentence [see 'constructionintegration' model (8)]. Fluent reading, or the ability to decode words automatically in context without compromising comprehension, depends on accurate, rapid decoding of words and relies on intact phonology, orthography and semantics, as well as basic cognitive abilities such as attention and other executive functions (EF) for cognitive control (9).…”
Section: The Importance and Complexity Of Reading Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%