2019
DOI: 10.1177/1460458219850682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and prevention of hypoglycaemic events in type-1 diabetic patients using machine learning

Abstract: Tight blood glucose control reduces the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes. However, this is very difficult due to the large intra-individual variability and other factors that affect glycaemic control. The main limiting factor to achieve strict control of glucose levels in patients on intensive insulin therapy is the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. Therefore, hypoglycaemia is the main safety problem in the treatment of type 1 diabetes, negatively affecting the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiello et al [ 67 ] and Oviedo et al [ 53 ] both aimed at postprandial hypoglycemia prediction by utilizing BG data combined with insulin and CHO data. Noaro et al [ 72 ] proposed an insulin bolus calculator while Vehi et al [ 59 ] proposed a hypoglycemia prediction and prevention system that employed BG, insulin, and CHO data for ML model training. A DSS that provides weekly insulin dosage recommendations for type1 diabetics was proposed by Tyler et al [ 61 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aiello et al [ 67 ] and Oviedo et al [ 53 ] both aimed at postprandial hypoglycemia prediction by utilizing BG data combined with insulin and CHO data. Noaro et al [ 72 ] proposed an insulin bolus calculator while Vehi et al [ 59 ] proposed a hypoglycemia prediction and prevention system that employed BG, insulin, and CHO data for ML model training. A DSS that provides weekly insulin dosage recommendations for type1 diabetics was proposed by Tyler et al [ 61 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have employed multiple variants of ANN such as RNN, DL, CNN, MLPs, etc. ANNs were used by Bertachi et al [ 41 ], Vahedi et al [ 33 ], Zhu et al [ 64 ], Mosquera-Lopez et al [ 81 ], San et al [ 35 ], Jin et al [ 36 ], Mhaskar et al [ 63 ], Li et al [ 74 ], Li et al [ 78 ], Bertachi et al [ 51 ], Güemes et al [ 60 ], Oviedo et al [ 53 ], Vehi et al [ 59 ], Quan et al [ 50 ], and Amar et al [ 75 ]. Unlike other ML models, ANNs extract their own features from the inputs based on their hidden parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, Vehì et al [ 61 ] proposed an AI-based DSS, called the Patient Safety System, for the prediction and prevention of hypoglycemic events and the classification of glycemic control profiles. The system is shown in Figure 5 and incorporates 4 modules: A grammatical evolution algorithm for 60-min ahead, personalized, glucose concentration level prediction, that uses, as input features, the CGM data, the IOB and the carbohydrates rate-of-appearance over the past 2 h [ 62 ].…”
Section: Glucose Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect that with further technology advancement as with the utilization of machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities to predict and prevent hypoglycaemic events may minimize hypoglycaemia harmful effects. Those tools will surely assume an important place in the world of hypoglycaemia assessment and management 107, 108 . Technology can be included as an important tool for evaluation of hypoglycaemia episodes, the identification of people at risk for hypoglycaemia and for prevention of hypoglycaemia events without compromising glycaemic control.…”
Section: Technology and Hypoglycaemiamentioning
confidence: 99%