2009
DOI: 10.1117/1.3216031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and validation of foliage projective cover from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree cover was derived from a data layer developed by the Brisbane City Council from an overstory foliage projective cover (FPC) map produced from LiDAR data for the region (acquired between March and June 2009; Armston et al 2009). Brisbane City Council compared the foliage projective cover maps against a mosaic of high resolution satellite images of the city produced from the WorldView2 instrument (0.5 m resolution) between 22nd March and 21st June 2010.…”
Section: Measures Of Vegetation Cover In Public Parksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree cover was derived from a data layer developed by the Brisbane City Council from an overstory foliage projective cover (FPC) map produced from LiDAR data for the region (acquired between March and June 2009; Armston et al 2009). Brisbane City Council compared the foliage projective cover maps against a mosaic of high resolution satellite images of the city produced from the WorldView2 instrument (0.5 m resolution) between 22nd March and 21st June 2010.…”
Section: Measures Of Vegetation Cover In Public Parksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were nominally cloud free and the look angle was specified to be as close to nadir as possible and no more than 18 degrees off nadir. Images were preferentially obtained in summer months (November-March) when the grass cover was senescent, which provided good contrast to the green overstorey foliage [36].…”
Section: Multi-temporal Spot5 Pan-sharpened Surface Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to insufficient field data to calibrate a model, we related the surface-reflectance of the 5 m SPOT5 imagery to a Landsat derived overstorey FPC product [25,36]. The Landsat FPC product was trained using QLD field measurements of FPC, and applied with a multiple linear regression model to Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+ data [36].…”
Section: Multi-temporal Foliage Projected Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations