2019
DOI: 10.34297/ajbsr.2019.06.001005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction Based on Random Survival Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we adopt tree‐based methods in this paper where the possible candidate estimators in step 2 are generated by repeated binary recursive partitions (Ishwaran et al., 2008, 2011). Tree‐based methods facilitate a comprehensive modelling scheme and are appealing for their ability to handle high‐dimensional covariates, facilitate complex and non‐linear relationships between predictors and outcomes, and relax the proportional hazard assumption (Jiang, 2019; Taylor, 2011). Given the tree‐based estimators in step 2, the optimal estimator in step 3 can be selected via cross‐validation by tuning the number of basis functions from step 1 and tree‐based parameters from step 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we adopt tree‐based methods in this paper where the possible candidate estimators in step 2 are generated by repeated binary recursive partitions (Ishwaran et al., 2008, 2011). Tree‐based methods facilitate a comprehensive modelling scheme and are appealing for their ability to handle high‐dimensional covariates, facilitate complex and non‐linear relationships between predictors and outcomes, and relax the proportional hazard assumption (Jiang, 2019; Taylor, 2011). Given the tree‐based estimators in step 2, the optimal estimator in step 3 can be selected via cross‐validation by tuning the number of basis functions from step 1 and tree‐based parameters from step 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It works on high dimensional data where the number of covariates exceeds the number of the observations. Also it can handle data that consist of complex and non-linear relationships between the dependant and the independent variables and when the covariates violate the proportional hazard assumption [ 35 ]. There are several advantageous of using the RSF method, such as, it is not based on any model assumption compared to Cox PH model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we adopt tree-based methods in this paper where the possible candidate estimators in step 2 are generated by repeated binary recursive partitions [Ishwaran et al, 2008[Ishwaran et al, , 2011. Tree-based methods facilitate a comprehensive modeling scheme and are appealing for their ability to handle data with high-dimensional covariates, facilitate complex and nonlinear relationship between predictors and outcomes and relax the proportional hazard assumption [Taylor, 2011, Jiang, 2019. Given the tree-based estimators in step 2, the optimal estimator in step 3 can be selected via cross-validation by tuning the number of functional basis functions from step 1 and treebased parameters which we discuss in detail in Section 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%