2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
100
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
15
100
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this finding suggests that people not just passively process the incoming sensory signal, but instead actively anticipate and predict what input they will receive. This shows that predictions in language processing are not limited to lexical-semantic predictions (Lau, Holcomb, & Kuperberg, 2013;Mani & Huettig, 2012;Otten, Nieuwland, & Van Berkum, 2007b;Szewczyk & Schriefers, 2013;Van Petten & Luka, 2012) but also include predictions about the specific social context in which the linguistic utterance should be interpreted. This finding generates interesting new ways to think about how people understand and interpret language.…”
Section: The Effect Of Laughing Others On Insult Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, this finding suggests that people not just passively process the incoming sensory signal, but instead actively anticipate and predict what input they will receive. This shows that predictions in language processing are not limited to lexical-semantic predictions (Lau, Holcomb, & Kuperberg, 2013;Mani & Huettig, 2012;Otten, Nieuwland, & Van Berkum, 2007b;Szewczyk & Schriefers, 2013;Van Petten & Luka, 2012) but also include predictions about the specific social context in which the linguistic utterance should be interpreted. This finding generates interesting new ways to think about how people understand and interpret language.…”
Section: The Effect Of Laughing Others On Insult Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, listeners are more likely to direct their eye-gaze to a picture of an edible object (e.g., a cake) when they hear the beginning of an utterance like 'The boy will eat…' compared to a neutral utterance such as 'The boy will move…' (Altmann & Kamide, 1999). Further, much evidence has suggested that comprehenders compute rich expectations about upcoming inputs at multiple levels of representation (syntactic: Ilkin & Sturt, 2011;Lau, Stroud, Plesch, & Phillips, 2006;Levy, Fedorenko, Breen, & Gibson, 2012;Omaki et al, 2015;Staub & Clifton, 2006;Wicha et al, 2004;Van Berkum et al, 2005;Yoshida, Dickey, & Sturt, 2013;lexico-semantic: Federmeier & Kutas, 1999;Kutas & Hillyard, 1984;Otten & Van Berkum, 2008;Szewczyk & Schriefers, 2013; phonological and orthographic: Delong et al, 2005;Dikker, Rabagliati, Farmer, & Pylkkanen, 2010;Dikker, Rabagliati, & Pylkkänen, 2009;Farmer, Yan, Bicknell, & Tanenhaus, 2015;Kim & Lai, 2012;Laszlo & Federmeier, 2009). Here, we operationally define 'prediction' as the pre-activation of stored representations before the bottom-up input is encountered, and we will make no a priori assumptions regarding the nature of the mechanisms involved (e.g., whether they are automatic or controlled).…”
Section: Prediction In Language Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar work has examined the impact of gender or animacy morphemes on a neutral prenominal element that match or mismatch a predicted noun (e.g. in Spanish When the king died the prince could finally wear the-masc/fem crownfem, from Wicha et al [29]); some of these studies have similarly shown N400 effects on the prenominal element [30] although in other cases the prenominal predictability effect has a different polarity or distribution [10,29,31]. In a different kind of design, Lau et al [32] show that the same semantic relation between a prime and a target (e.g.…”
Section: The N400 Responsementioning
confidence: 99%