2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijogct.2017.087042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction model for coal-gas outburst using the genetic projection pursuit method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e mechanism of gas outburst in the working face is complicated, which is the result of a combination of factors such as geostress, coal seam gas, and physical and mechanical properties of the coal body [5]. Based on the historical data of gas outburst accidents and consulting relevant references [2][3][4]24], this paper selects failure type of coal (X 1 ), initial velocity of gas emission (X 2 , mL/s), coal solidity coefficient (X 3 ), gas content (X 4 , m3/t), drill cuttings amount (X 5 , kg/ m), gas pressure (X 6 , MPa), depth of coal mining (X 7 , m), coal seam thickness (X 8 , m) as the influencing factors for the occurrence of outbursts. e amount of coal (rock) outburst is used as the basis for classification usually.…”
Section: Extraction Of Factors Influencing Gas Outburstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e mechanism of gas outburst in the working face is complicated, which is the result of a combination of factors such as geostress, coal seam gas, and physical and mechanical properties of the coal body [5]. Based on the historical data of gas outburst accidents and consulting relevant references [2][3][4]24], this paper selects failure type of coal (X 1 ), initial velocity of gas emission (X 2 , mL/s), coal solidity coefficient (X 3 ), gas content (X 4 , m3/t), drill cuttings amount (X 5 , kg/ m), gas pressure (X 6 , MPa), depth of coal mining (X 7 , m), coal seam thickness (X 8 , m) as the influencing factors for the occurrence of outbursts. e amount of coal (rock) outburst is used as the basis for classification usually.…”
Section: Extraction Of Factors Influencing Gas Outburstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Solving the Optimum Projection Direction Equations ( 6) and ( 7) are utilized to compute the optimal projection vector. Generally, most scholars would use GA [13,15,16] and other algorithms for the solution. However, the GA has drawbacks, including the computing result having certain dependence on the initial population selection, its slow convergence speed, and its excessive parameter settings [18,19].…”
Section: Projection Pursuit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively analyse complex indexes in the research of gas outburst prediction, Liang [13] established a prediction model by using a PPM optimized by a genetic algorithm (GA). In this model, the one-dimensional projection values calculated by the GA were used to indicate the potential gas outburst risk, and the PPM was confirmed to be objective and effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temperature and coal dust) by multiple types of sensors, integrated the collected data on an expert system, and assigned the confidence to each prediction outcome. Liang et al [16] analyzed the general framework of multi-sensor data fusion, designed the structure of a gas outburst prewarning system based on multi-sensor data fusion, built up a data fusion model with a feature layer and a decision layer, and realized feedbacks through a multi-sensor management subsystem, achieving closed-loop control of the prediction system. He et al [17] proposed a systematic gas outburst prewarning model that integrates multi-sensor data, in the light of the hierarchical fusion principle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea of fuzzy set theory is to make memberships in general sets more flexible, and thus extend the membership of an element for a set to any number in the interval [0, 1], rather than 0 or 1. Hence, the FCE is a suitable method to describe and process the uncertainty of sensor data [16].…”
Section: Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (Fce) Of Multi-sensor Datamentioning
confidence: 99%