2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of air pollutants for air quality using deep learning methods in a metropolitan city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…R-squared is used to determine how well a model generalizes. Low R-squared values may indicate that the model has overfitting problems and fits new data poorly [8,[24][25][26]. In this study, we aim to find the predictive modeling closest to our experimental results, to see the deviations from the experimental values, and to capture the relationships between a dependent variable and an independent variable.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R-squared is used to determine how well a model generalizes. Low R-squared values may indicate that the model has overfitting problems and fits new data poorly [8,[24][25][26]. In this study, we aim to find the predictive modeling closest to our experimental results, to see the deviations from the experimental values, and to capture the relationships between a dependent variable and an independent variable.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mentioned that the hybrid model has a greater success rate in estimating. Das et al 48 apply multilayer perceptron (MLP), RNN, and LSTM methods separately to PM 10 and SO 2 concentration data of the Başakşehir district of Istanbul province. It is revealed that the LSTM method produced the best outcome.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das et al [57] compared the performance of MLP, RNN, and LSTM models in predicting air pollutants such as PM10 and SO 2 . The evaluation metrics used were MSE, RMSE, MAE, and R2.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%