2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of blast induced ground vibrations and frequency in opencast mine: A neural network approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many scholars highlight the successful use of these techniques in the field of ground vibration prediction. Khandelwal and Singh (2006) examined empirical predictors and artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict PPV and frequency values obtained from 150 blasting events and concluded that ANN results are more accurate compared to empirical predictors. In another study of ground vibration prediction, Monjezi et al (2011) developed ANN, empirical and statistical models for blasting operations conducted in Siahbisheh pumped storage dam, Iran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars highlight the successful use of these techniques in the field of ground vibration prediction. Khandelwal and Singh (2006) examined empirical predictors and artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict PPV and frequency values obtained from 150 blasting events and concluded that ANN results are more accurate compared to empirical predictors. In another study of ground vibration prediction, Monjezi et al (2011) developed ANN, empirical and statistical models for blasting operations conducted in Siahbisheh pumped storage dam, Iran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explosives release a large amount of energy during explosion, the majority of which is wasted in the form of ground vibration, backbreaks, air breaks, flying rocks and noises. Only 25-30% of the explosive energy is utilized for breaking and displacement of rocks (Khandelwal et al 2005, Khandelwal andSingh 2006). Energy generated during blasting has not been fully utilized for rock breakage due to the presence of uncertainties in rock parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is strongly suggested not to set the error goal at absolute zero; rather it should be slightly higher than zero as Refs. [40, 125,126] fixed the error goal at 0.001, 0.01 and 0.005 respectively. This is because vibration response usually contains noises to some degrees due to poor sensor calibration, high sensitivity or operational fault of sensors, structure's non-uniformity in material, etc.…”
Section: Error Goalmentioning
confidence: 99%