2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40789-015-0095-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of cavity growth rate during underground coal gasification using multiple regression analysis

Abstract: During underground coal gasification (UCG), whereby coal is converted to syngas in situ, a cavity is formed in the coal seam. The cavity growth rate (CGR) or the moving rate of the gasification face is affected by controllable (operation pressure, gasification time, geometry of UCG panel) and uncontrollable (coal seam properties) factors. The CGR is usually predicted by mathematical models and laboratory experiments, which are time consuming, cumbersome and expensive. In this paper, a new simple model for CGR … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order not to overestimate ground surface subsidence and stresses in 3D models as discussed by Adhikary et al [30], UCG reactor growth is considered to occur simultaneously in 50-m steps along the pre-defined UCG channels, determined by an average gasification front progress of 1 m/day. The selected reactor growth rate is in good agreement with the empirical model presented by Najafi et al [12], allowing for predication of UCG reactor growth rates under various operational and geological boundary conditions. Data published on previous field-scale UCG activities exhibit reactor growth rates varying from 0.35 to 1.2 m/day.…”
Section: Numerical Model Geometry Parametrization and Boundary Condisupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order not to overestimate ground surface subsidence and stresses in 3D models as discussed by Adhikary et al [30], UCG reactor growth is considered to occur simultaneously in 50-m steps along the pre-defined UCG channels, determined by an average gasification front progress of 1 m/day. The selected reactor growth rate is in good agreement with the empirical model presented by Najafi et al [12], allowing for predication of UCG reactor growth rates under various operational and geological boundary conditions. Data published on previous field-scale UCG activities exhibit reactor growth rates varying from 0.35 to 1.2 m/day.…”
Section: Numerical Model Geometry Parametrization and Boundary Condisupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Especially thermo-mechanical effects and/or fault reactivation may introduce potential migration pathways for hazardous environmental contaminants, mainly composed of organic and inorganic pollutants [4,9,11]. Site-specific coupled thermo-mechanical processes occurring in rocks adjacent to a deep UCG reactor are generally not well known in the field, because of the difficulty to quantify all occurring chemical reactions during the UCG process and their effects on UCG reactor size and shape [12]. Current knowledge on these processes is mainly based on laboratory experiments [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and a few successful UCG field trails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Countries with low per capita energy consumption experience low per capita gross domestic products (GDP) [1]. Coal is the largest fossil fuel resource in the world [and many countries use coal for energy production due to its availability, reliability, and relative low cost [2,3]. In the year 2017, coal provided 35% -40% of the global electricity generation [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of reactor growth depends on a number of factors, some of which can be controlled, such as the rate of air or steam injection, as well as the geological boundary conditions affected by the chemo-thermo-hydro-mechanical properties of the coal and its overburden [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%