Abstracts 1977
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-021308-8.51344-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Clinical Response to Arabinosylcytosine (Ara-C) Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

38
419
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(458 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
38
419
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we find that the two galaxy subgroups have essentially indistinguishable total optical and near-infrared luminosities, central stellar velocity dispersions, and luminosity-weighted mean stellar ages and metallicities on nuclear ( < ∼ 300 pc) scales. The lack of young or intermediate-age stars in LINERs strongly rule out starburst and post-starburst models for the excitation of LINER-like emission, further strengthening the proposition that LINERs are lowluminosity AGNs (Ho 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, we find that the two galaxy subgroups have essentially indistinguishable total optical and near-infrared luminosities, central stellar velocity dispersions, and luminosity-weighted mean stellar ages and metallicities on nuclear ( < ∼ 300 pc) scales. The lack of young or intermediate-age stars in LINERs strongly rule out starburst and post-starburst models for the excitation of LINER-like emission, further strengthening the proposition that LINERs are lowluminosity AGNs (Ho 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…First, the SDSS sources have redshifts z ≈ 0.05−0.1, much more distant than the Palomar galaxies. As discussed by Ho (2008), aperture effects render the interpretation of LINER emission in distant galaxies somewhat problematic. Second, the stellar population analysis method of this paper differs from that used in the SDSS studies, and it is unclear if there are residual systematic discrepancies between the different methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations