2016
DOI: 10.3390/computers5030013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Dermoscopy Patterns for Recognition of both Melanocytic and Non-Melanocytic Skin Lesions

Abstract: Abstract:A differentiation between all types of melanocytic and non-melanocytic skin lesions (MnM-SK) is a challenging task for both computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and dermatologists due to the complex structure of patterns. The dermatologists are widely using pattern analysis as a first step with clinical attributes to recognize all categories of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs). To increase the diagnostic accuracy of CAD systems, a new pattern classification algorithm is proposed to predict skin lesions pattern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its overall sensitivity and accuracy exceeded RF, Gentle AdaBoost, SVM, k‐NN, Fuzzy NN and systems based on Bagging of Features (BoF) models. Lastly, Abbas et al manipulated image features representative of lesion' patterns to classify pigmented skin tumours, through the use of majority voting with support vector machine, achieving accuracy, sensitivity and specificity values of 93%, 94% and 84%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its overall sensitivity and accuracy exceeded RF, Gentle AdaBoost, SVM, k‐NN, Fuzzy NN and systems based on Bagging of Features (BoF) models. Lastly, Abbas et al manipulated image features representative of lesion' patterns to classify pigmented skin tumours, through the use of majority voting with support vector machine, achieving accuracy, sensitivity and specificity values of 93%, 94% and 84%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8], [14], [18], [26], our method DWT [12], [13], [15], [23], [24], [29], [30], [31] GWT [21], [27] CT [19], [20], [25] PCA…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8], [14], [19], [23], [29] Texture features [24], [25], [26], [28], [31] Color feature [19], [20], [21] Shape features [26], [27] Statistical parameters…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations