“…shown that the accuracy of this methodology in calculating the solid-state ionization potential (IP), electron affinity (EA), transport gap, polarization energy, and exciton binding energy values, is comparable to that of state-of-the-art many-body perturbation theory within the GW approximation, with the results in excellent agreement with experimental data. [16][17][18] In this Letter, we apply this methodology to evaluate the singlet-triplet gap of four representative organic compounds (shown in Figure 1) as a function of the solid-state environment (for the sake of comparison, calculations were also performed with the widely used B3LYP functional). We have considered two TADF donor-acceptor-like molecules, TXO-TPA and TXO-PhCz, see Figure 1, which combine a 9-H-thioxanthen-9-one-10,10-dioxide (TXO) acceptor unit and either triphenylamine (TPA) or N-phenylcarbazole (N-PhCz) as a donor unit; these were taken from the work of Wang et al 7 In addition, we have investigated PXZ-TRZ (10-(4-(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5triazin-2-yl)phenyl)-10H-phenoxazine), which has been reported to have a very small ΔE ST of ~0.06 eV 6 , as well as CBP (4,4'-bis(carbazol-9-yl)-p-biphenyl), which has a large ΔE ST of ~0.71 eV 6 (we note that CBP is not a TADF molecule and is usually employed as a hole-transporting material in conventional OLEDs).…”