2014
DOI: 10.1504/ijmpt.2014.062934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of fatigue life of packaging EMC material based on RBF-SVM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison results of the prediction performance of these models are shown in Table 4. The correlation coefficient of SGBS model is 0.962, larger than that of the models of linear regression [23], BP neural network [24], GRNN neural network [7], SMO-SVR [25], and SVR [26], proving that the linear regression relationship of the SGBS model is better than that of the other five models. In the SGBS model, the root mean squared error and root mean squared error are 20.8668 and 26.520%, respectively, lower than those of the other models, certifying its better prediction performance.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison results of the prediction performance of these models are shown in Table 4. The correlation coefficient of SGBS model is 0.962, larger than that of the models of linear regression [23], BP neural network [24], GRNN neural network [7], SMO-SVR [25], and SVR [26], proving that the linear regression relationship of the SGBS model is better than that of the other five models. In the SGBS model, the root mean squared error and root mean squared error are 20.8668 and 26.520%, respectively, lower than those of the other models, certifying its better prediction performance.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it has been proved that classification effects of class 3 by this model are the best, while those of class 1 and class 2 are lower. In experiment 2, the GABD method has been compared, under the same sample database, to the support vector machine (SVM) [12], BayesNet [13], multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network [14], RBF neural network [15], and BP neural network [16] models, respectively, in order to further check the detection to the surface texture of polyimide matrix's inorganic nanocomposite thin film. The comparison results of the classification performances of detection models are obtained, as shown in Table 4 and Figure 6.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Through the comparison experiment we know that the classification performance of GABD is better than that of SVM [12], BayesNet [13], multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network [14], RBF neural network [15], and BP neural network [16] models under the same sample database. Moreover, it is superior to single classifiers with respect to the accuracy of nanocomposite film detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al demonstrated good fitting accuracy by utilizing an SVM model optimized by a genetic algorithm to model the fatigue life of materials. A fatigue prediction model of elastic memory composites materials was developed using an RBF SVM by Guo et al A. Hemmati‐Sarapardeh et al used four different machine learning methods to estimate the physical properties of pure substances . A computational intelligence (CI)‐based load forecasting technique and its optimizations with both heuristic and meta‐heuristic methods were reviewed systematically by S.N.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tao et al 12 15 A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh et al used four different machine learning methods to estimate the physical properties of pure substances. 16 A computational intelligence (CI)-based load forecasting technique and its optimizations with both heuristic and meta-heuristic methods were reviewed systematically by S.N.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%