44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-1148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for Underwater Vehicles Using Overset Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the two-dimensional (2D) NACA 0012 hydrofoil experiments, the predicted wave elevations near the foil are slightly lower and no breaking wave is apparent (Duncan, 1983).…”
Section: A Noncavitating Wing Interacting With a Freesurfacementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to the two-dimensional (2D) NACA 0012 hydrofoil experiments, the predicted wave elevations near the foil are slightly lower and no breaking wave is apparent (Duncan, 1983).…”
Section: A Noncavitating Wing Interacting With a Freesurfacementioning
confidence: 97%
“…2. The term / p Q τ Γ ∂ ∂ is a result of the Choi-Merkle, dual-time preconditioned approach(Choi and Merkle, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly an appropriate turbulence closure model (TCM) is required, which can model the influence of turbulence on the flow. It is believed that the discrepancies between numerical and experimentally calculated hydrodynamic derivatives, up to 20%, for a manoeuvring underwater vehicle, observed in previous studies, [3], [4], [5] and [6] are largely due to these issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As the design iterates towards its final form, more expensive analysis techniques become appropriate, and RANS simulations may be used to represent numerically the pure drift and rotating-arm tests traditionally used to derive the hydrodynamic derivatives of ships and submarines (see, for example, references [29] to [32]). The present authors [33] used the commercial RANS code ANSYS CFX to derive the hydrodynamic derivatives for the AUV Autosub3.…”
Section: Hull Fairingmentioning
confidence: 99%