2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of incident vertebral fracture using CT-based finite element analysis

Abstract: Purpose: We aimed to determine the association between vertebral strength by quantitative computed tomography (CT)-based finite element analysis (FEA) and incident vertebral fracture (VF). In addition, we examined sensitivity and specificity of previously proposed diagnostic thresholds for fragile bone strength and low BMD in predicting VF. Methods: In a case-control study, 26 incident VF cases (13 men, 13 women) and 62 age and sexmatched controls aged 50 to 85 years were selected from the Framingham multi-det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FEA is a validated engineering technique that has been successfully employed to asses bone strength in the hips and spine. [51][52][53][54] It already has been reported to be superior to DXA scans in predicting fragility fractures at the hip and spine, 53,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] and could provide further insight into the diagnosis and risk stratification of osteoporotic patients prior to undergoing surgical procedures of the spine. While oCT is an enticing diagnostic test, it is still limited in its sensitivity and specificity to be used as a diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEA is a validated engineering technique that has been successfully employed to asses bone strength in the hips and spine. [51][52][53][54] It already has been reported to be superior to DXA scans in predicting fragility fractures at the hip and spine, 53,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] and could provide further insight into the diagnosis and risk stratification of osteoporotic patients prior to undergoing surgical procedures of the spine. While oCT is an enticing diagnostic test, it is still limited in its sensitivity and specificity to be used as a diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone is then isolated from the surrounding tissues and organs (posterior elements are virtually removed for the spine) using advanced image processing. Unlike with spinal DXA for which four vertebral levels are typically assessed, analysis of just one [33,34] or two [35] vertebral levels (between T12 and L3) by BCT has been shown to be effective for spinal fracture prediction; similarly, analysis of just one femur is adequate for hip fracture prediction [16,20,35]. To provide a patientspecific calibration and therefore enable a diagnostic-quality measurement of BMD, the CT scan is calibrated using either an external calibration phantom (typical in research studies) or a phantomless approach (typical in clinical practice) using internal tissues as references (details below).…”
Section: Details Of the (Virtuost) Bct Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between BCT and DXA (center) was similar to that between left and right hip for DXA (right) and over twofold higher than between hip and spine for DXA (left). From Fidler [47] standard deviation for vertebral fracture were consistently higher for vertebral trabecular BMD than for spinal DXA BMD, both for prevalent fracture-1.9 vs. 0.7 [62]; 1.9 vs. 1.3 [63]; 3.4 vs. 1.9 [64]-and for incident fracture-5.7 vs. 3.2 [33]; 2.4 vs. 1.8 [34]. Limited comparative data exist on sensitivity and specificity for predicting new vertebral fractures by vertebral trabecular BMD versus spinal DXA BMD.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mesh model generated in SolidWorks 2017CAD was imported into ANSYS Workbench 17.0 (ANSYS, Ltd., Canonsburg, PA, USA), and previous literature was referenced to set the cortical bone (osteoporosis), cancellous bone (osteoporosis), articular cartilage, endplates, annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, bone cement, cages, and internal fixation ( Table 1). The ligaments were simulated using spring elements that were only stressed by pulling force (one ligament stimulated by one spring) [17][18][19][20]. The contact type between the models was defined in the connection, where in the facet joint contact type was frictional and the frictional coefficient was 0.2 [21]; the remaining contact types were set to be the bonded mode [20,22].…”
Section: Materials Properties and Biomechanical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%