2007
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2007)11:4(427)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Interfacial Bond Failure of FRP–Concrete Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
42
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the test procedure most frequently used by researchers to measure bond strength. A number of recent studies based on this method have been published, specifically, by Yao et al (2005); Sharma et al (2006);Ferracuti et al (2007); Toutanji et al (2007), and Mazzotti et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the test procedure most frequently used by researchers to measure bond strength. A number of recent studies based on this method have been published, specifically, by Yao et al (2005); Sharma et al (2006);Ferracuti et al (2007); Toutanji et al (2007), and Mazzotti et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several effective testing methods have been proposed, including the single shear test and the double shear test. Among these, the single shear test has become the standard experiment for measuring the shear bond strength because of its simplicity and reliability [3][4][5][6]. By the single shear test, researchers can observe the * Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To drive a reliable model for predicting the externally bond strength between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites and concrete structures, a comprehensive database of laboratory testing from Chajes et al (1996), Maeda et al (1997), Täljsten (1997), Ueda et al (1999), Zhao et al (2000), Adhikary and Mutsuyoshi (2001), Fu-quan et al (2001), Nakaba et al (2001), Wu et al (2002), Tan (2002), Ren (2003), Dai et al (2005), Yao et al (2005), Sharma et al (2006), Toutanji et al (2007) and Ueno et al (2014), including 342 sub assemblages are collected from published literature as presented in Table 2. It should be noted that the adhesive material properties for some datasets were not provided.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%