2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2005.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of MHC class II binders using the ant colony search strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single most selective event defining T cell epitopes is the binding of peptide fragments to the HLA complexes (Yewdell and Bennink, 1999;Haque and Blum, 2005). Most HLA class II binding prediction methods have been trained and evaluated on very limited data sets covering only a single or a few different HLA class II alleles (Karpenko et al, 2005;Murugan and Dai, 2005;Chang et al, 2006;Salomon and Flower, 2006;Bui et al, 2005;Nielsen et al, 2004;Wan et al, 2006;Brusic et al, 1998). To the best of our knowledge, methods like Propred (Singh and Raghava, 2001) and TEPITOPE (Sturniolo et al, 1999), are experimentally derived virtual matrix-based prediction methods that cover different HLA-DR alleles.…”
Section: Majormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single most selective event defining T cell epitopes is the binding of peptide fragments to the HLA complexes (Yewdell and Bennink, 1999;Haque and Blum, 2005). Most HLA class II binding prediction methods have been trained and evaluated on very limited data sets covering only a single or a few different HLA class II alleles (Karpenko et al, 2005;Murugan and Dai, 2005;Chang et al, 2006;Salomon and Flower, 2006;Bui et al, 2005;Nielsen et al, 2004;Wan et al, 2006;Brusic et al, 1998). To the best of our knowledge, methods like Propred (Singh and Raghava, 2001) and TEPITOPE (Sturniolo et al, 1999), are experimentally derived virtual matrix-based prediction methods that cover different HLA-DR alleles.…”
Section: Majormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simon et al indicated that it is only through the appropriate selection of parameters that it will be possible for the ACS to show a high level of convergent behavior [38]. Karpenko et al maintained that the algorithm performance is sensitive to the parameter selection in the ACS [39]. Shi et al indicated that the α , ρ, Q, and β parameters in the ACS affect the calculation efficiency and the convergence of the algorithm directly or indirectly [40].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent applications of ACO to problems arising in these areas include the applications to protein folding [83,84], to multiple sequence alignment [76], and to the prediction of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II binders [57]. The protein folding problem is one of the most challenging problems in computational biology, molecular biology, biochemistry and physics.…”
Section: Applications Of Aco Algorithms To Discrete Optimization Probmentioning
confidence: 99%