1964
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.135.b515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction ofp-,d-, andf-Wave Pion-Nucleon Scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of solution at 300 MeV does tend to be important (though probably not critical) as a starting point of higher-energy analyses. Dynamical pre dictions based on longer-range pion-nucleon forces (40,41) are in reasonable agreement with the values at ",300 MeV of Table I; detailed comments and comparisons on this and other points are given by Hull & Lin (39) . Apart from the P 33 phase shift, one of the most interesting features of the solution is that the pu phase shift is negative at low energies, but passes through zero near 170 MeV to become positive and rapidly increasing at the end of our energy range.…”
Section: Partial-wave Amplitudes To 300 Mevsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The choice of solution at 300 MeV does tend to be important (though probably not critical) as a starting point of higher-energy analyses. Dynamical pre dictions based on longer-range pion-nucleon forces (40,41) are in reasonable agreement with the values at ",300 MeV of Table I; detailed comments and comparisons on this and other points are given by Hull & Lin (39) . Apart from the P 33 phase shift, one of the most interesting features of the solution is that the pu phase shift is negative at low energies, but passes through zero near 170 MeV to become positive and rapidly increasing at the end of our energy range.…”
Section: Partial-wave Amplitudes To 300 Mevsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…and/or cr s for virtual yp scattering; and W 2 is related to the combination o^ + a s . 6 iM# 2 ) includes all the necessary factors of a, a-1, r(a), etc. In particular Pp(q 2 ) * 0 because of the mechanism which reinstates the Pomeranchukon contribution (see Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the error matrices of the acceptable SPD and SPDF solutions are also given in Tables VII and VIII. The agreement with other experiments, notably with Foote and Rogers, is good. The evidence which led to the rejection of solution C (Fermi-II) is substantiated 12 which is based on dispersion relations for the partial-wave scattering amplitudes. Because of the method of their analysis, their predictions are valid only for V^ 1, but they improve with increasing L. The results of these…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%