2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of myopia onset with refractive error measured using non-cycloplegic subjective refraction: the WEPrOM Study

Abstract: Background/aimsTo evaluate the predictive performance of various predictors, including non-cycloplegic refractive error, for risk of myopia onset under pragmatic settings.MethodsThe Wenzhou Medical University Essilor Progression and Onset of Myopia Study is a prospective cohort study of schoolchildren aged 6–10 years from two elementary schools in Wenzhou, China. Non-cycloplegic refraction, ocular biometry and accommodation measurements were performed. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent (SE) ≤−0.5 diop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The refraction was transformed into spherical equivalent (SE = sphere power + 0.5cylinder power). Refractive status was judged according to SE [myopia: SE ≤ −0.5D ( 26 , 27 ); emmetropia: −0.5D < SE < +1.0D; hypertropia: SE ≥ 1.0D].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refraction was transformed into spherical equivalent (SE = sphere power + 0.5cylinder power). Refractive status was judged according to SE [myopia: SE ≤ −0.5D ( 26 , 27 ); emmetropia: −0.5D < SE < +1.0D; hypertropia: SE ≥ 1.0D].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aim of improving accessibility of myopia risk assessments, this study developed the first risk score system that used ocular biometry alongside patient characteristics such as age and number of myopic parents, to provide a scalable, population-based clinical tool for premyopia. Without the need for cycloplegic refraction data inputs, the calculator can provide a score range that gives an estimated risk of myopia that will hopefully encourage early referral to eye vision specialists 24,25. It is noteworthy that when cycloplegic refraction is not available, UCVA and noncycloplegic refraction are commonly used as referral criteria for school screening or general physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the clarity of risk factors, the prediction model of myopia has also been widely concerned. Our compact model including only 10 non-ocular features had a high prediction performance even better than some models including ocular biometry and genetic information [ 19 , 43 , 44 ]. Wong et al developed models based non-cycloplegic SE, axial length and positive relative accommodation, with AUC values of 0.64, 0.62, and 0.66, respectively, and their combination with age, gender and parental myopia only achieved an AUC of 0.74 [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%