2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of nanofluids viscosity using random forest (RF) approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike linear or simple regression where the aim is to minimize error rate, SVR is used to fit error within a certain threshold. It is developed on the elements of SVM, whereby the data points about a hyperplane are distinctly segregated with support vectors that are the closest points to the generated hyperplane in n-dimensional feature space [66]. This model is also a popular choice for curve fitting and prediction of linear/nonlinear regression types [67].…”
Section: Support Vector Regression (Svr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike linear or simple regression where the aim is to minimize error rate, SVR is used to fit error within a certain threshold. It is developed on the elements of SVM, whereby the data points about a hyperplane are distinctly segregated with support vectors that are the closest points to the generated hyperplane in n-dimensional feature space [66]. This model is also a popular choice for curve fitting and prediction of linear/nonlinear regression types [67].…”
Section: Support Vector Regression (Svr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In existing works of literature, SVR has been used in engineering science [76], biomedical [77], and social science [78]-related researches. Specifically, it has been used for Covid-19 cases prediction [66], CO 2 sequestration study [68], solar irradiance prediction [79], hybrid nanofluid conductivity prediction [32], and other regression tasks. SVR models differ based on the regularization term used for the structural complexity and the specific choice of loss function used in measuring the empirical risk [80].…”
Section: Support Vector Regression (Svr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ease of representing a physio-chemical process with datadriven machine learning algorithms has increased in the past few years. Different algorithms were implemented in the literature to estimate the viscosity of nanofluids, such as ANN, LSSVM, RF, and ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference) [35,64].…”
Section: Predictions Via Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the ANN method was better than correlation development. Gholizadeh et al [35] used RF approach to predict the viscosity of metallic oxides-based nanofluids and reported 0.989 R 2 for the model accuracy using multi-input parameters. It is noteworthy to mention that while the results obtained by machine learning predictive methods proliferate, the inner working of these tools remains elusive when it comes to physical insights or scientific principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Fig. 9 (a), (b) and (c), it is evident that the number of trees (n) that is enough to stabilize the error is about 250, 250 and 500 for tensile modulus, tensile strength, elongation at break, respectively [71,72]. Since there was a large variation of values of elongation, the extra step of scaling was carried out.…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms: I Random Forest Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%