1994
DOI: 10.1109/20.272521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of open-circuit airgap field distribution in brushless machines having an inset permanent magnet rotor topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, from Fig. 3(c), the Kirchhoff's law is applied to node , and loop 1-4: (12) It yields the expressions of the leakage fluxes, i.e., (13) (14) (15) (16) Therefore, the average air-gap flux density excited by is (17) Similarly, according to Fig. 3(d), the average air-gap flux density excited by is given by (18) As shown by the curve 1 in Fig.…”
Section: Analytical Model For Multisegment Ipm Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, from Fig. 3(c), the Kirchhoff's law is applied to node , and loop 1-4: (12) It yields the expressions of the leakage fluxes, i.e., (13) (14) (15) (16) Therefore, the average air-gap flux density excited by is (17) Similarly, according to Fig. 3(d), the average air-gap flux density excited by is given by (18) As shown by the curve 1 in Fig.…”
Section: Analytical Model For Multisegment Ipm Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a lumped magnetic circuit model usually is a good compromise between simplicity and accuracy [3]- [9]. By way of examples, Laplacian or quasi-Poissonian field equations were directly solved analytically for SPM machines [10], [11] and inset PM machines [12], conformal mapping techniques were used for analyzing the influence of stator slotting [13]- [15] and rotor saliency in IPM machines [16], [17], while lumped magnetic circuit methods [3]- [9], [18]- [26] were extensively used for SPM machines [18]- [20], switched reluctance machines [21], linear brushless dc machines [22], hybrid stepping motors [5], salient-pole synchronous machines [23], flux-switching PM machines [24]- [26], inset PM machines [6], IPM machines [3], [4], [7]- [9], etc. In the lumped magnetic circuit analysis, the permeances of stator yoke and rotor yoke were often omitted for simplicity [5]- [7], [9], [18], [22], [25], [26], or handled with the nonlinear B-H curve of iron by iterative process for higher accuracy [3], [4], [8], [19]- [21], [23], [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-D analytical magnetic field calculations have been reported for both surface-mounted and surface-inset PMs [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] in which some of them deal with the slotless stator structure and some others investigate the slotted stator structure . Analytical magnetic field expressions have been utilized to calculate the PM eddy-current loss with(out) the current penetration effect [4,14,28], cogging torque [13,32], reluctance torque, instantaneous torque [27,30], back EMF waveforms [5,24,27], self-/mutual-inductances [2,27], and UMFs [5,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other three parts consider the magnetic field due to the stator currents [23], the effects of stator slotting on the field [24], and the combination of fields due to the magnets and stator currents, resulting in the field in a loaded machine [25]. In [26], Zhu et al further develop their analytical model to predict the magnetic field due to inset magnets. In [27], several improvements on [17] are documented: internal and external rotors are now included in their model, as well as both radial and parallel magnetization.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%